882 Is Mr. Bernie Sanders, runners-up to Hillary Clinton for Democratic Presidential Candidature, turning Pro-Trumper?

Is Mr. Bernie Sanders, runners-up to Hillary Clinton for Democratic Presidential Candidature, turning into Pro-Trumper? Ans: It appears so. See this link: Click here to go to http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/bernie-sanders-can-work-with-trump-233532, an study how Mr. Sanders is eager to bend and kneel!. Prima facie it may appear that, losing-rivals in contests ought to co-operate with winners, and extend their helping hand in furthering the goals of the subject matter of the Competition, such as a "A Company, A Political Party, A Nation" or anything similar. But should there not be limits for such co-operation? Else, if the losers join the winners, what will happen to the innocent supporters, sympathizers, voters, writers, etc. who stood behind the losing campaigners? Are the supporters, sympathizers, voters, writers, media, workers, fools? In case of bourgeoisie politicians and parties, since all the parties and politicians have same or similar philosophies, such drastic shifts become understandable. But, this cannot be done in case of (self-proclaimed) Socialist politicians like Bernie Sanders.

"... I don’t think it makes sense to say, ‘No, we’re not gonna work in any way in any form with the Trump administration. ..."

"...Trump has talked appropriately about a collapsing infrastructure: our roads, bridges and water systems. If he is prepared to work with us on rebuilding America’s crumbling infrastructure and creating millions of jobs and doing it in a way that doesn’t privatize our infrastructure or give tax breaks to billionaires, yes, let’s work together . ..."

"...If he is prepared to work with us on a trade policy which works for the American worker and not just the CEO of large multinational corporations, let’s work together on those areas ..."

"...There will be no compromise on bigotry... There can be no compromise there, There can be no compromise, in my view, on protecting American democracy, working against voter suppression that many Republican governors are trying to bring about, and in my view there can’t be any compromise on climate change. ..."

ybrao-a-donkey's views which are not intended to be imposed on others:

I know I day-dream. Mr. Bernie Sanders also seem to day-dream, when he imposes some conditions on Mr. Donald Trump (see the above conditions). Is Mr. Sanders over-estimating himself? Does Mr. Trump need Sanders' support? Even if he needs, will he care to obtain the support, by melting down his own well-published convictions, fancies, announcements, whims, what not? Even if Trump is ready to compromise, will his Republican supporters, Business and Industrialist supporters, allow it?

Socialism is not just a question of some Allocations of funds for Infrastructure , or some modification of Trade Policies. The scope and spectrum of Socialism is too vast, and is un-compromise-able. If an American Socialist President could not be elected in 2016, he-she can be elected in 2020 or 2024. Four years period is too short a time, in histories of Nations. Ordinarily, there will not be any need to compromise.

QUALITY OF VOTERS AND QUALITY OF MPs REALLY MATTER

What determines the future of a Nation is the quality of its voters, and the quality of MPs they elect. In the interregnum between two elections, what genuine Socialists can do, will be-- to strive to improve the quality of voters, and the candidates they vote for.

Question: Why the quality of voters and MPs, is so important?

Ans: Introducing and implementing True Total Socialism, is not going to be as easy as Demonetizing a Nation's currency, or pushing Nations into skirmishes, battles and wars. When an effort is made to introduce true total socialism, even Civil Wars which may have an intensity greater than the Civil War which Abraham Lincoln fought, may arise/result. Without good quality citizens, and citizens' representatives, Socialism will fail a la the Bolshevik Revolution 1917. Anyway, a Self-proclaimed Socialist, expecting much from a hardcore Capitalist like Mr. Donald Trump, will be a wild goose chase. It will be like a thirsty person trying to quench his thirst, while running to capture water from a mirage.

There is a beautiful Telugu language verse to express this idea:

Poet Vemana, महा कवि वेमन. 15th Century A.D. Book: Vemana Satakam. वेमन शतकं. వేమన శతకం. Verse in Roman Script:

goDDuTAvu pituka kunDa kom pOyinA
panDla nUDa tannu, pAla niDadu
lObhi vAni naDuga lAbhambu lEdayA
viSva dAbhi rAma vinura vEma.

Hindi script:
गॊड्ड टावु पितुक कुंड कॊंपोयिना
पंड्ल नुड तन्नु पाल निडदु
लोभि वानि नडुग लोभंबु लेदया
विश्व दाभिराम विनुर वेम.

In Telugu script: గొడ్డు టావు పితుక కుండ కొంపోయినా
పండ్ల నూడ తన్ను పాల నిడదు
లోభి వాని నడుగ లాభంబు లేదయా
విశ్వదాభిరామ వినుర వేమ.

Englsh Gist: If we take a pot, and approach a barren-cow to milk it, it will kick us in such a way that we lose our teeth. But it will not yield any milk. This simile is used to justify the moral taught in the third line of the verse: There is no use of approaching and begging a miser (for loan or for financial help). A miser will not help.

Vemana wrote thousands of great verses in Telugu language. They convey not only ethics and morals, but they also communicate spiritual, mystical, renunciation-al (vairAgya) messages, most of which are secular. They are not religious prayers. About 5000 of such verses, in Telugu script are now available for download on internet. Late C.P. Brown, who worked for the East India Company in India, in 19th Century, translated many of them into English prose. PDF version of Brown's prose translation is available on Internet. One can google.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

800 "Our Revolution" organisation promoted by Mr. Bernie Sanders will it serve as a PRESSURE GROUP?

Here is a link to click to go to rt.com/usa/357086 web page- bernie sanders announcing his non-profit organisation "Our Revolution". . Readers may recall that Mr. Bernie Sanders, the runners'-up Chief rival claimant to the Democratic Party candidature for American Presidential Election 2016, lost his campaign. His loss is quite understandable considering the American propensities to support individualism, and individual self-confidence of citizens, sometimes reaching to heights of arrogance, as Citizens of the Policeman of the World. According to NYTimes: "...Top officials at the Democratic National Committee criticized and mocked Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont during the primary campaign, even though the organization publicly insisted that it was neutral in the race, according to committee emails made public on Friday by WikiLeaks. ...". Whatever be the reason for loss of a historic opportunity for Mr. Sanders, as anticipated by us in our previous blogposts, he has started a new organisation named "Our Revolution".

Mr. Sanders' quote/action	ybrao-a-donkey's humble view
“It is nice to be home, as I have said a million times, real change doesn’t take place from the top down."	If Mr. Sanders believed what he said on the podium, he would not have contested for the Democratic Nomination to the Presidential job. He might have, in right earnest, initiated the change from the bottom. That means, he might have started the "Our Revolution" organisation first, and passed on the baton to his disciples who were to carry on the change to the next American Generation. In my mother tongue Telugu language, there is a proverb "andani drAksha panDlu pullana". Approx. English: In an Aesop's fable like Telugu folk story: A fox tried to catch hold of a bunch of grapes, but could not, as the bunch was at a height. After its attempts failed, the fox withdrew saying "Grapes which are beyond reach, tend to be sour". A true socialist cannot join and continue in a bourgeoisie party, hope for its top nomination. It is outright, a weird idea like a square peg in a round hole. Fail, then say we have to start from bottom. This seems to be inappropriate to my immature mind. Besides, if top is rotten, bottom may not be able to restore the top to health. Bottoms will have to dump the tops. It can happen even through change of hearts and ballets. But this change of hearts has to last longer. Else the changes brought out by Revolutions will be reduced to a heap of s***.
"...To help hundreds of thousands of people fighting at the grassroots level,the independent nonprofit organization Our Revolution is being formed."	The "Our Revolution" Organization floated by Mr. Sanders ought not to try to hijack the Democratic Party which has a bourgeoisie roots, philosophical base, and which never claimed to be socialist. Mr. Sanders has to launch it either as a new Political Party with Socialist Principles, having a clear-cut SOCIALIST tag in the name itself. There can't be a via media approach for True Socialism. It must straight promise EQUALISM, removal of private property, abolition of money and monetary economy, dumping Wall Street into the Atlantic Ocean, a Marriage-less society, a secular common civil code, introduction of physical labor in addition to mental labor for all physically-fit and mentally-fit persons capable of working. Equalism and Socialism ought not to tolerate LAZY CLASSES ROLLING ON COUCHES, on the pretext of accumulated past earnings, or practising some aristocratic businesses or elite professions. Tinkering with medicare, College fees etc. have already been ineffectively tried by bourgeoisie parties. There is no use of harping the same insipid and stale tunes. I cannot resist the idea of getting an impression that the "Our Revolution" promoted by Mr. Sanders may at the most serve as a pressure group on Ms. Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Party, or on Mr. Donald Trump, if he gets elected as President. The interviewer at RT.com Mr. Ed Schultz, who talked with Mr. Cohen (Communications Manager of Mr. Sanders) seems to be right in his futuristic comment: "what might come of the movement if 'Our Revolution' doesn't get off to a great start?". Of course, nobody can expect astounding success for the 'Our Revolution' in its very first year of existence. Normally revolutions tend to be bubbles and foams of exuberant or exorbitant effervescence lasting a few years, after which some unscrupulous fellow takes over organisations and runs them as despotic tyrannies, though 'labels' may continue. This is because members lack deep-rooted convictions in their philosophies, or because the successors lack the same commitment to philosophies which the founder-members had. Uplifting of founding members to numbness by forming "marga-darsak-mandal (Council for showing path)" is also possible. The name of the organisation ought to have been "Our Evolution" (or "Our Evolution into True Socialists") instead of "Our Revolution". Revolutions tend to be cyclic. Evolutions will be irreversible, and they will have only changeable futures and not hackneyed pasts, unless there are grave reasons warranting "retrogression" an inevitable imperative.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

723 Mr. Bernie Sanders should have the courage to say that he will close down Wall Street

Mr. Bernie Sanders, the Democratic Rival of Ms. Hillary Clinton, for the American Presidential Democratic Nomination 2016, declared himself a Socialist, and promised huge outlay on Health Care and Free College Education. To finance the outlay, he plans to raise taxes on Wall Street Speculators. One immediate question which arises is "Do the Wall Street Speculators remain silent if Mr. Sanders raises taxes on them?". They will play their own games to browbeat the ideas of Mr. Sanders. All over the World, Governments pay Health Care costs from pooled Tax Incomes collected from all the Citizens, which include Corporates, but does not target them specifically. Vox.Com has published a Survey Report which indicates that supporters of Mr. Bernie Sanders may not pay more than $1000 as additional taxes. The title of the Report is: "Most Bernie Sanders supporters aren't willing to pay for his revolution".

For those Readers who wish to study the News Report here is the link: (Click to go to Vox.com.) . Here is a quote from the News Report:

But in order to pay for his proposed programs, Sanders needs to increase taxes on virtually everyone in America. So if you're a voter, the question is simple: Are you willing to pay more taxes for his proposals, like nationalized health care and free public college tuition?
How much more?

When we polled voters, we found most Sanders supporters aren't willing to pay more than an additional $1,000 in taxes for his biggest proposals. That's well short of how much more the average taxpayer would pay under his tax plan.

If the Administration of Mr. Bernie Sanders (if at all selected by Democratic Party as its Candidate, and if at all elected by the American Voters as President), and if Mr. Sanders ventures to tax the Wall Street Speculators, and they puncture his his ideas mercilessly, like the previous American Presidents, Mr. Sanders will either have to tax common people and spend on Health Care or , remain mum, and retire coolly after four years.

Where all the common people or poor people have to bear the burden of Health Care and College Costs of other American Poor who may need them, that will become only a sort of Insurance, which is based on all the people sharing the risk of some people and compensating them in case of loss. Those who undergo health loss, or those who have offsprings undertaking higher studies, will gain at the cost of others who do not suffer health loss or do not have College going children. This type of Insurance is a British and American business technique. Common people as a class will have nothing to gain through such methods.

In Telugu language, there is a proverb: "kAkulanu koTTi gaddalaku vEyaTam". Its approx. English gist is: Beat the crows, and feed the eagles. Beating somebody, and with the booty, feed somebody else.

In India, at All India level, a method similar to the above is followed: Introduce or raise some cess, on an essential commodity such as petrol / diesel, or an essential service like telecom. This Cess is called SBC Svachh Bharat Cess. It has been introduced in the 2016-17 Budget. It may come into force in November 2016. Or an additional Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) is levied on Corporate Dividends, for those tax payers who get a dividend exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs (Rs. 1 million).

In India, at the level of States (Provinces), the State Governments usually raise Taxes on Liquors or raise Registration charges for Immovable Properties. Or raise the land value for calculation of land value, for calculation of Stamp duty and Registration Fees.

MR. SANDERS SHOULD HAVE THE COURAGE TO DECLARE THAT HE WILL CLOSE WALL STREET

Everybody knows that all Stock Exchanges are Highly Respected Gambling Houses. Stock Brokers are the sacred Bishops, Arch Bishops and Cardinals of the Religion of "World Economic Religion". Wall Street is no exception. It is the World's largest gambling house.

It is not clear, to what extent the Wall Street Speculators rob the American Citizens. Suppose, the Wall Street Speculators rob the Rest of the World Speculators, and enrich themselves, the American Citizens may not feel the pinch. If raised taxes can be collected from the Wall Street Speculators for Health Care and Free College education, the American Citizens will definitely welcome it.

ETHICAL QUESTION WILL REMAIN

"Rob the World and feed the American Citizens" cannot be called ethical, from the point of view of this World. But it can be ethical by American standards. An American President has to serve only American interests and American needs, this may, well suit to be theme for Trump but not for Sanders.

But if Mr. Sanders can take to "True and Total Socialism" to his heart, he has to take a global view of the global poor. The best thing for him to do will be, to CLOSE DOWN THE GAMBLING DENS, i.e. the Wall Street itself.

Subject to corrections and deletions. To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

721 Mr. Sanders will have to turn the page and learn the work. He can look back to Abraham Lincoln.

2016 American President Elections. Mr. Bernie Sanders, rival to Ms. Hillary Clinton to get Democratic Nomination, cannot any longer delay his reply to Time.Com, which has raised some important questions about acceptance of High Dollar funds from Lobbyists, Pressure Groups. Here is a link to the Time.com How Convention Costs Put Bernie Sanders in a Bind- by Zeke J Miller @ZekeJMiller 12th Apr 2016. (Click to go to Time.Com.) .

Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders has scored political points off his rival’s high-dollar fundraising, while lambasting the influence of the “a handful of billionaires, their super PACs and their lobbyists” in the American political process.

But should he win the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders stands to be the beneficiary of the same largesse he targets on the campaign trail.

Sanders has not responded to repeated questions from TIME over several months about whether he would ask the Democratic National Committee to stop raising money from federal lobbyist money or PACs if he is the nominee, as well as whether he would return corporate funds solicited for the convention.

The gist of the question will lead to a dilemma: If Mr. Sanders gets Democratic Nomination, will he avail of the High-Dollar funds raised by Ms. Hillary Clinton from Corporates and Lobbyists? All the time, he has been criticising his Rival, that she is mobilising funds from Corporates and Lobbyists.

In other words, the dilemma is practising, what is preached.

Without high-dollar funds from Democratic National Committee, it appears as though Mr. Sanders cannot fight the super-rich Trump. If Mr. Sanders uses the high-dollar funds, he will become cheap in the eyes of the voters.

When I discussed this predicament of Mr. Sanders, with a friend of mine, he suggested that Mr. Sanders should turn the page and learn the Work. By "turn the page", he meant that Sanders should turn the pages of history and find out what Mr. George Washington, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, Mr. Franklin Roosevelt et al had done, when they faced crises.

According to me, among the three Presidents mentioned above, I could not believe that Messrs. George Washington and Franklin Roosevelt could face a funds crises. They might have fought their electoral battles on equal play-fields. Mr. Abraham Lincoln might have faced this problem, but I am unable to trace any historical records.

But, the Gettisburg Address of Lincoln showed his courage of convictions. and his preparedness to face challenges, including a Civil War. Now, Mr. Bernie Sanders will not face anything like a Civil War situation, but, there is a danger of Mr. Trump outmanoeuvreing him.

The problem with Mr. Sanders seems to be, though he is making facades of a "Socialist" and a "fighter against the Wall Street", he seems to have already compromised on the issue, though he is not announcing it to the outside world. In the 240 years of American History, none of the American Presidents had to fight that type of a Virtual Civil War, which can lead to more far reaching consequences than the Real Military Civil War of the Lincoln Days. If Mr. Sanders decides to face the Corporate World with a straight sword, he will become the First American President to become the Champion of the people in gutters.

Had Mr. Sanders foreseen such possibilities, he ought to have started his preliminary campaign itself as a very very low cost Campaign. At every stage, he ought to have cut expenditure by 75% of the normal spendings.

But, one thing appears to be true. He did what which the previous Campaigners never bothered about. HERE is a quote from vetsforbernie.org which reports that Bernie Sanders paid overtime to Marshal Town Police for the security arrangements. (Click to go to go to vetsforbernie.org.)

IOWA (VFB) — When Presidential candidates come to town, local police departments spring into action to ensure not only that candidate’s safety, but the safety of the public and everyone involved. Substantial time and resources are spent planning and executing such events, which if not reimbursed by the campaigns, must be covered by local taxpayers.

"...I think a lot of people just assume that those costs are being reimbursed, and they aren’t," Marshalltown, IA Police Chief Mike Tupper, told me over the phone Tuesday afternoon.

"...I am happy to report that Bernie Sanders paid."

"...Not only did Sanders pay, 'He actually asked up front how much, and he paid those costs, which makes him the first candidate to do so in my 23 years [of law enforcement in Iowa].' Not only did Sanders pay, "...He actually asked up front how much, and he paid those costs, which makes him the first candidate to do so in my 23 years [of law enforcement in Iowa]. ..."

Hence, we need not doubt the sincerity and integrity of Mr. Sanders. Yet, there is a problem. If he accepts Corporate Funds, after winning Elections, he cannot harden his stance towards them. His softness, will make him a piece of butter for the Corporate knives.

Apart from Electoral funding, even if there is no need of electoral funding, Heads of State and , Heads of Government cannot today avoid the Corporates altogether, until TRUE AND COMPLETE SOCIALISM is implemented in TOTO. Even after execution, the Heads will have to face the problem of providing Essential needs i.e. food, clothing, shelter, education, health care to the citizen. As long as Socialist Nations can produce all their needs in STATE SECTOR, WITHIN THE COUNTRY, the Socialist Citizens will be happy.

But, for numerous reasons such as crop failures, natural calamities, political upheavals in neighboring countries, every country whether Socialist or Capitalist is bound to face domestic shortages, which are to be met through imports.

If Socialist Citizens can live happily, limiting their demands and needs to the bearest, a Socialist Nation can survive. But the neighboring Capitalist countries will not allow a Socialist country to exist. It will be an eyesore for them. There is no place for "contentment and satisfaction" in Capitalist countries. Nor they can tolerate such "contentment and satisfaction" which does not exist in their own countries, to exist in Socialist countries.

Anyway, let Mr. Sanders cross the first post, i.e. win the Democratic Nomination.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

708 Part 1/10 of Establishing and Running Political Parties, Practical Problems भाग १ -राजनीतिक दतों के स्थापना और संचालन कर्ना భాగం ౧ రాజకీయ పార్టీలను స్థాపించటం, నడపటం సమస్యలు

1996: Mr. Nagabhairava Jayaprakash Narayan, Retd. I.A.S. Officer, Andhra Pradesh State, India, founded a Movement called "Lok Satta". It literally means: "Satta=power. Lok=People. Lok Satta=Power of the People". So far so good. He converted LokSatta into a political party in 2006, initially as a State Level Party, and subsequently an All India level party. 2016 March: Shri Jayaprakash Narayan, is reported to have announced that he is quitting politics, and that Lok Satta would continue as a non-political organisation. He is also reported to have said that they will not be contesting elections. Today, one Telugu Channel telecast a report about it, intermittantly tinging it with a Telugu Language song from dEvadAsu titled "antA bhrAnti yEnA, jIvitAna velugintEnA, AASA nirASEnA migilEdI cintEnA? అంతా భ్రాంతి యేనా జీవితానా వెలుగింతేనా? ఆశా నిరాశేనా మిగిలేదీ చింతేనా ? Approx. Engl: Is everything an illusion? Is there no light in life? Should hope become a disappointment? What remains? Only regrets, remorse(s) and repentance(s)? "

It is difficult to answer this question.

Disappointments may arise when persons start organisations with personal ambitions and goals. On the other hand, if persons believe that their duty and task are just to spread the right principles and theories, while at the same time trying to bring them into implementation and launch stage. What is more important is, parties are not founded by persons. Parties are founded by principles which motivate persons.

There are bound to be revolts, treacheries, upheavals, and disappointments in politics. India is not the only country, where this problem exists.

For example, in United States, Mr. Bernie Sanders, the 74 years contender for Democratic Presidential Nomination, may have to face a similar disappointment, particularly because he is getting advanced in age. The other two runners-up in Republican Presidential Nomination, Mr. Ted Cruz (just 45 years age), Mr. Marco Rubio (just 44 years age), at least have an advantage of age before them. They can try and succeed next time.



There is one big difference between United States, and India. Members of Parties in United States, elect their nominees, through some sort of democratic process of voting, howsoever, skewed or defective it may be. Parties in India, on the other hand, do not have any proper democratic process to elect Presidential, Prime Ministerial Nominees. Parties in India are personal fiefdoms of the Founders and their coteries.

Aspirants for Party Presidential Nominations in United States, mobilise huge funds from both large donors, and small donors, though technically every candidate claims he-she has mobilised funds mostly from small donors. Whatever it is, in United States, fund mobilisation depends on personal efforts of the candidates and their supporters.

Lok Satta and Aam Admi Parties in India promised to become exceptions to the general rule of parties being personal fiefdoms, but experience shows that they are not exceptions. Mr. Jayaprakash Narayan tried to monopolise Lok Satta. Mr. Arvind Kejriwal monopolised Aam Admi Party. Though BJP claims to be not a dynastic party, it is remotely controlled by its founding organisation R.S.S. (Rashtriya Svayam Sevak Sangh).

HARD AND HARSH REALITIES

Parties in India (or probably in the entire world, including United States) cannot be run without funds.

Promoters and Founders of Parties have to depend on Corporates for large chunk of funds for running parties.

Industrialists and Business Persons demand their shares of the spoils, demanding a greater role for them, via Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha Memberships, Admission into Cabinet with key portfolios, favourable tax and industrial policies to their industrial and business empires.

Parties depend on Film Stars, Cricketers for mass appeal, nominating them to Legislatures and Parliament. Example: BJP has issued ticket to Mr. Srishant, a Cricketer, to contest from Tiruvananthapuram Assembly.

If these are the realities, parties can never be run as CLEAN ENTITIES.

We have to work out practical ways-out for this existential and survival issue.

SOME SOLUTIONS

Founders of parties, basically do not want to lose control over the organisations they establish. Consequently, Parties lose their internal democracy. Howsoever energetic and charismatic leaders of parties may be, the structures of parties cannot be built downward from top to bottom. They are to get elected from bottom grass-roots to top. One question remains. Unscrupulous persons who do not have any commitment to the principles of the party, or who do not have at least their own principles join the party and hyjack it. This danger intensifies when a party shows signs of scoring in elections. As long as a party does not show tendencies of succeeding, no unscrupulous person will come forward to join. The crucial question, therefore, should admissions into parties be rigidly controlled?

Under ordinary circumstances, local units of parties are to have the authority to admit new members. Decentralisation is the ideal option, but affluent persons may dominate local units, by bringing their own henchmen into the Party.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

681 Women too have penises, American Presidential Aspirants must know this!

The best assessment of Mr. Donald Trump, the likely Republican Candidate for the American Presidency 2016-2020 has been provided by Freddy Gray, the Dy. Editor of Spectator.co.uk. in his piece of write up titled: Donald Trump's angry America. After the disappointment of Barack Obama, the country is turning mean. Link: Click to go to Spectator. . I do not know how many grassroot level voters in United States of America will read it, try to understand the consequences of electing a money-maniac as President, of the Dictator-State of this World.

No difference, basically exists, between the lumpen-proletariat of the United States and the lumpen-proletariat of India. There is adult franchise / adult suffrage in both the countries. Hindi: प्राथमिकतः, अमॆरिकन् बुध्धु दरिद्रतम श्रामिक जनावली और भारतीय बुध्धु दरिद्रतम श्रामिक जनावली के मध्य , अंतर कुछ नहीं है, है तो भी, बहुत कम है। दोनों देशों में बालिग मताधिकार है।



I believe that most of my Readers will get, if they read the above-lined article of Mr. Freddy Gray, a reasonable understanding of what Mr. Donald Trump stands for, and will strive for if he is elected, as President of the Largest Consumer Nation of this Earth. यह मेरा विश्वास है कि : उपरोक्त लिंक में दिया हुआ श्री फ्रॆड्डी ग्रे के उततम व्याख्या पढने के बाद, हमारे विज्ञ पाठको अमॆरिकन चुनावों को बारे में , डोनाल्ड ट्रंप के बारे में, उनके भविष्य प्रणालियों के बारे में, कृत्यों के बारे में, एक उत्तम अवगाहन अवश्य मिलेगी । इस दुनिया मे सब से बडा विनियोग वस्तुवों के, भोक्ता, उपभोक्ता है न। डोनाल्ड ट्रंप को भारतीय श्रामिकों के ऊपर कैसे बेवकूफी नासमझी पागली भावना है ?

TRUMP MAY NOT KNOW THAT WOMEN TOO HAVE PENISES

Donald Trump discussed penis size at debate, as his rival mocked at his 'little hands'.

Trump's nasty remarks came after Marco Rubio mocked him after his success on Super Tuesday.

Trump habitually ridicules his fellow contenders about their work, physical well being and success. Trump called his rival Marco, 'Little Marco' , referrring to his height.

Marco retailiated at Trump, saying 'he (Trump) has little hands.'

Trump's rebuttal:

'...Look at my hands. Are these small hands? If they are small, something else must be small too. ...'

'I guarantee you,...'

Deccan Chronicle link for reading the above news item at Deccan Chronicle.com: Link: Click to go to D.C.

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

American voters too have a fantasy and fetish towards the size of penises.

P R O O F

Size of the Multi Million Dollar Market, for drugs, tools, methods and techniques for enlarging penis. At least 10% of the Internet is gaga with penis-therapy related spams.

Another funny thing: Both the Republican Aspirants for the Presidency have forgotten that women too have their biological penises (clitoris is nothing but degenerated penis, when men and women separately evolved from their hermaphroditehood. The female penises may not be equal in size to male penises, but in their effectiveness (in the meaning of: their utility value for generating orgasm).

There is nothing prima facie, wrong in discussing penises. Such openness promotes transparency and eliminates hypocracies. But men candidates should not underestimate women.

Tailpiece धूमकेतू తోకచుక్క

IF for any reason, if Mr. Donald Trumps fails to become President of United States for any reason, he should come to India, and take some lessons from Mr. K. Chandrasekhara Rao (popular as KCR), the Chief Minister of Telangana.

There may not be any shortage of land in U.S.A. Yet, if Mr. Donald Trump wishes, after taking a course of "how to capture power by instigating hatred between people", he can take a short course, from Mr. Narayana, a Cabinet Minister in Andhra Pradesh State, on how to indulge in Insider Trading involving Government decisions, and buy thousands of acres of benami lands.

Of course, Mr. Trump & his rivals may already be knowing these techniques. But, as far as, moolah accumulating techniques are concerned, there can't be "big leader" , "small leader". Exchange of information, helps both.

Subject to substantial Revision, additions and deletions. To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.

654 Part 1 of American Presidential Elections 2016 &, will Socialism sprout in USA? भाग १ , अमॆरिका अध्यक्ष चुनाव २०१६ & क्या अमॆरिका में सोषलिजम अंकुर होगा ? భాగం ౧, అమెరికా అధ్యక్ష ఎన్నికలు ౨౦౧౬ & అమెరికాలో సోషలిజం అంకురిస్తుందా.

Mr. Bernie SAnders is one of the top contenders for the American Presidential Candidature from Democratic Party, in United States. He positions himself to be a Socialist (Socialist Democrat). In his Campaigns, he restrains himself from disclosing in depth, what type of Socialism he is going to induct into the predominantly Capitalist United States.

In Hindi, India's National Language: श्री बॆर्नी सांडर्स महोदय, इस साल अमॆरिका में होने वाले अध्यक्ष चुनाव में डॆमोक्राटिक पक्ष के नामिनेशन पाने के लिये प्रयत्न शील अभ्यर्धियों में हिलरी क्लिंंटन के साथ प्रतियोगिता में भाग ले रहे है। ७४ साल उम्र में श्री बॆर्नी सांडर्स , अमॆरिका वॆर्मांट राज्य के एक सीनियर पार्लमॆंटेरियन है। श्री बॆर्नी सांडर्स के चित्र पट, जीवित विशेष, राजनीतिक अनुभव आदी विशेष, हम निम्नोक्त वीकीपीडिया सैट पर देख सकते हैं. लिंक :

In Telugu, mother-tongue: శ్రీ బెర్నీ సాండర్స్ గారు, ఈ సంవత్సరం అమెరికాలో జరుగనున్న అధ్యక్ష ఎన్నికలలో, డెమోక్రాటిక్ పార్టీ అభ్యర్ధిగా ఎన్నిక కావటానికి పోటీ పడుతున్నవారిలో, క్లింటన్ సతీమణి హిలరీ క్లింటన్ గారితో ఇంచుమించు సమాన స్థాయిలో ఉన్నవారు. 74 సంవత్సరాల వయస్సు ఉన్న ఈ సీనియర్ రాజకీయ వేత్త, అమెరికా లో వెర్మాంట్ రాష్ట్రానికి చెందిన సీనియర్ పార్లమెంటరియన్. శ్రీ బెర్నీ సాండర్స్ గారి చిత్రపటం, జీవిత విశేషాలు, రాజకీయానుభవం, మొ. పలువిషయాలు, ఈ క్రింది వికీపీడయా వెబ్ సైట్ లో పూసగుచ్చినట్లుగా ఉన్నాయి. వీకిపీడియాలో వీటిని పరిశీలించటానికి లింకు ఇదిగో.

Click to go to Wikipaedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders.

"...I don’t believe government should take over the grocery store down the street or own the means of production, but I do believe that the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a decent standard of living and that their incomes should go up, not down. I do believe in private companies that thrive and invest and grow in America, companies that create jobs here, rather than companies that are shutting down in America and increasing their profits by exploiting low-wage labor abroad...."

Approx. gist in Hindi, the National Language of India: "...मै यह विश्वास नहीं करता हूँ कि, सर्कार बजारों में किराणा दुकानों को चलाना । मै यह नहीं मानता हूँ कि, राज्य , उत्पत्ति साधनों (व्यवसाय क्षेत्र, कार्खाने वगैरह ) के यजमानी बने रहना । लेकिन, मै यह चाहता हूँ कि, अमॆरिका में संपत्ती उत्पत्ती करनेवाले मध्यम वर्ग, और श्रामिक वर्ग परिवार, एक शालीन जीवन प्रमाण पाने के लिये योग्य हैं। उनके आय बढना, गिरना नहीं। मै यह भी यकीन करता हूँ कि, अमॆरिकन कंपॆनीयों अमॆरिका में ही सुसंपन्न होना, पूंजी करना, वर्धमान होना, ओर अमॆरिका में ही नौकरियों को बढाना । वे, ऐसे कंपॆनी नहीं होना कि वे अमॆरिका में बंद हो कर, विदेशों में कम वेतनों से कूलियों को लूटी करके, अपने लाभों को बढाना । ... "

Approx. gist in Telugu Language, spoken by 100 million people: "...వీధిలో చిల్లర కొట్లను ప్రభుత్వం నడపాలని నేను నమ్మను. లేక ఉత్పత్తి సాధనాలను(కర్మాగారాలు, పొలాలు మొ.) లను ప్రభుత్వం స్వంతంగా ఉండాలని నేను నమ్మను. కానీ అమెరికాలో సంపదను ఉత్పత్తి చేసే మధ్యతరగతి, మరియు శ్రామిక వర్గ కుటుంబాలు ఒక చక్కటి జీవన ప్రమాణాలను పొందటానికి అర్హులని నేను నమ్ముతానువ. వారి ఆదాయాలు పెరగాలి, కానీ క్రుంగకూడదు. నేను, ప్రైవేటు కంపెనీలు, అమెరికాలోనే విలసిల్లాలనీ, తమ పెట్టుబడులను పెట్టాలని, వర్ధిల్లాలనీ, నేను తప్పక నమ్ముతాను. ఆ కంపెనీలు, అమెరికాలోనే ఉద్యోగాలను సృష్టించాలనీ, అవి అమెరికాలో మూతపడి, విదేశాలలో తక్కువ జీతాల కూలీలను దోపిడీ చేసి తమ లాభాలను పెంచుకునేవి గా ఉండకూడదనీ నేను నమ్ముతాను. ...."

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

The Greatness of Mr. Bernie Sanders, can at least be found, in one thing. His capability to maintain equi-distance from both Democrats and Republicans. He, contesting as an Independent Candidate, got elected as Mayor of Burlington City Council defeating both Democratic and Republican Party Candidates. It is not clear whether American Constitution permits Independent Candidates in the Presidential Elections, apart from the Traditional Parties of Democratic and Republican Parties. If it permits, I would have wished that Mr. Sanders ought to have contested as an Independent Candidate, instead of as a Democratic Nominee.

Reason: Both Democratic and Republican Parties in United States, are bourgeosie parties. Whatever be their pretences of Liberalism, essentially they are stooges of Capitalists. In this respect, there is not much difference between Indian Political Parties and the American Political Parties. Both depend on legal and illegal secret donations from Business Tycoons and Industrialists.

Though, prima facie, the politicians both in North America and Europe, who claim to be Socialists, Social Democrats, Democratic Socialists etc., basically they are not Socialists in true sense. They are only Conservatives, at the most, with a Leftist strain, not enough to call them Socialists. This experience we have had a taste in 2015, in the Greece Economic Crisis.

But, if the political history of Bernie Sanders placed in Wikipaedia is not concocted or window-dressed by somebody who happens to be a part of his Campaign Staff / Contractors or his Sympathizers, there is enough material to show that he seems to have at least some Socialist ideas, when compared to European Socialist Claimants, including the British Labor Leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

However, the quote given be me above , taken from Wikipaedia, does not justify that deduction or inference. His words do not differ much from the words of our own bourgeoisie political leaders in India.

One probable possible reason for reluctance of Mr. Sanders to come out openly with purer, more radical and stronger views may be owing to perceived allergies of American Middle Class voters who are supposed to abhor Communism, Marxism and Socialism. About the Proletarian voters in United States and the Proletarian voters in India, they seem to have similar behaviors, beliefs, actions and reactions.



To continue. सशेष. సశేషం.