Monday, August 6, 2018

1071 It may not be sufficient to have a strong ITCH to prove that somebody is corrupt!


Shri G.V.L. Narasimha Rao, hailing from Residual A.P., Rajya Sabha B.J.P. Member elected from Uttar Pradesh, appears to be a person in a hurry to prove that Shri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu, Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, and the Ruling Telugu Desam Party are corrupt, and are to be dislodged immediately. Shri Naidu may, or may not be corrupt. In fact, how many Chief Ministers and Ruling Parties of the 29 States in India can genuinely escape the taint of "Corruption" ? I get an impression that somebody from behind is prodding him from behind to show his mettle, so as to justify his anointment to Rajya Sabha (Upper House of Parliament in India).

This post is incomplete. Shall try to complete shortly.

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

1070 Temples and accumulations of gold


There seems to be an impression among some of my readers that I am not sufficiently criticising Mr. Nara Chandrababu Naidu, the 2014-18 Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh. The particular context in which this Criticism has arisen is, about the allegations made by Mr. Ramana Deekshitulu, Former Chief Priest of Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam about the loss of a diamond called "Pink Diamond", which according to him, was transported abroad, and sold in a foreign auction a few months back, for a very fabulous price, and about his allegations of digging the Temple Kitchen for stealing Centuries old Temple Treasures of gold ornaments which might have been stored underground. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has already phoo-phooed the allegations made by the Former Chief Priest of the Temple.

Allegations about non-traceability of gold and diamond ornaments presented by Vijayanagara Emperor Srikrishna Devaraya in first half of 16th Century


This allegation has met with an explanation that the Ornaments presented by Sri Krishna Devaraya were lost at times unknown, but definitely prior to 1953 or prior to India's Freedom in 1947.

ybrao-a-donkey's clarification to the Criticism that I have not sufficiently criticised Mr. Naidu


This blog does not aim to purposefully praise/criticise anybody or any Organisation including Mr. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India, Mr. Nara Chandra Babu Naidu, Chief Minister of Residual Andhra pradesh, or Mr. K. Chandrasekhara Rao, Chief Minister of Telangana State or anybody else. I neither benefit/lose by writing about them.
The purpose of this Blog is to help people get enlightened about the benefits of Atheism, and True Total Socialism (a variation of Marxism after eliminating its loopholes and pitfalls), and bolstering it with practical solutions for meeting problems of a Truly Socialist Society. Present rulers of India, and the World mostly fall under bourgeoisie Class, and their methods of ruling-working will not change by praising X and criticising Y. They are all part of the Obnoxiously Vicious Systems of Feudalism and Capitalism, which have exploited poor and gullible people over Centuries.

Question: You seem to be trying to avoid answering inconvenient question. Else, you should reply.


Mr. Vijayasayi Reddy, YSRCP Leader is said to have made an allegation that:--Click here to go to http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2018/may/24/missing-ttd-jewels-in-andhra-pradeshs-cm-n-chandrababu-naidus-residences-ysrc-national-general-1818783.html
"...the “missing” jewellery from the Tirumala temple found its way to the residences of Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu. ..."

"...if any independent investigating agency like the CBI conducts raids on the residences of Naidu in Amaravati and Hyderabad within 12 hours, the jewellery can be recovered. "...If there is any delay in conducting raids, the valuable jewellery may find its way to foreign countries ..."

ybrao-a-donkey's personal view


Prima facie, it seems that Mr. Vijaya Sayi Reddy appears to be making a baseless allegation. He is not an ordinary guy. He is a Rajya Sabha Member, i.e. an "Elder". As a Rajya Sabha Member he ought not to have done that. Anyway, since an Hon. Rejya Sabha Member has made an allegation, Mr. Chandra Babu Naidu ought to have requested by A MOST EXPEDITIOUS MODE OF COMMUNICATION AVAILABLE TO HIM AT CHIEF MINISTER'S OFFICE, and asked the Center to Order a CBI Investigation. On behalf of State Government, he ought to have sent a similar message to CBI direct, with a request to raid/search his house immediately. With that, the responsibility of Mr. Naidu would have ended. After Mr. Naidu comes out unhurt, appropriate action ought to have been taken against Mr. Vijayasayi Reddy, i.e. "Law can it take its own course". Instead, Mr. Naidu preferred to allow his Party Members to threaten Mr. Vijaya Sayi Reddy, that legal action will be initiated against him. But that does not cleanse Mr. Naidu of the rubbish which Mr. Reddy threw on him.

Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy,and Mr. Vijaya Sayi Reddy themselves are facing CBI Court Trials for Quid Pro Quo corruption. For them to make baseless allegations against others, will be like 'throwing stones from a glasshouse'.

Here we should refer to a quote said to have been made by Late Winston Churchill, Former Prime Minister of U.K., about Indian Politicians:

Power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low calibre & men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power and India will be lost in political squabbles.

A day would come when even air and water would be taxed in India.


ybrao-a-donkey: There is not enough proof for the above quotes attributed to Churchill. Anyway, whether Churchill really made that Statement or not, the above words are proving themselves to be truths about Indians, and Indian Rulers.

Question: Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy has recently, from his glasshouse, thrown stones on Mr. Pavan Kalyan, Jan Sena Founder. You seem to be a dog of Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy.


Ans: I am not dog of anybody.
Here is what Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy was reported to have said against Pavan Kalyan:---Click here to go to: https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/bridegroom-forever-jagan-gets-personal-pawan-kalyan-85384
“... He speaks about values… where does he have values? He has four wives. He changes them as if changing new cars every four or five years. Had we done the same thing, what will people say? Wouldn’t they have called us ‘nitya pellikoduku’ and put us behind bars. Isn’t it polygamy? ...”


ybrao-a-donkey: In Telugu language, there is a proverb: 'gongaTlO tinTU venTrukalu lekka peTTukunnaTlu'. English: 'While eating on a rug, a person has started counting threads of wool/hair'. It is not possible to say whether Jagan is better or Pavan is better. It will be like chosing between "Devil and Deep Sea".

Question: Again you are trying to escape from the question. Answer straight.


Ans: This question can be answered in thousand ways.

One way: Indian Leaders and Rulers of 21st Century cannot lag behind their Ancient and Medieval Counterparts. Lord Krishna had eight dharma patnis (those who sit beside husband in religious rituals) and 16,000 + 16,000 patnis (married wives). Dasaratha had 3 dhrmapatnis, 350 wives, and unknown number of concubines. There is ambiguity in Valmiki Ramayana about polygamy of Lord Shri Rama. Hence gets benefit of doubt, and is considered as 'Eka patnivrata'. Vijayanagara King Devaraya II had thousands of wives. Akbar had thousands of wives. Nizams had thousands of wives. Even the beloved Telugu Emperor Shri Krishna Deva Rayalu of 16th Century had number of wives. And all these Leaders are greatly revered. Polygamy is not a disqualification for them. But, then in those days, Wives were personal properties who can even be wagered in games of dice. Kingdoms were personal properties which can be lost in bets by gambler kings like Yudhishthira, Nala.

Today, wives may or may not be personal properties. Where wives are rich, have their own means of living, some physical attractive body/beauty, they may not like to be personal properties. A similar situation may not exist in case of poor women who suffer in the hands of philandering husbands. A rich husband can easily dispose of a rich wife, with a mutually acceptable formula of maintenance, wealth sharing, providing inheritance to offspring(s) etc. Need to get pecuniary benefits-- both present and future may also restrain separating wives from speaking out '(complete?) truths'. They may be delivering out truths in instalments.

Question: How many wives a person can have, is a personal matter. How can it be a qualification or disqualification for a politician?



Incomplete. To continue adding / deleting / modifying.

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

1069 Some Musings on Householdership, Monkhood, Contemporary World


I air/outspeak some of my musings/reflections on the Current Scenario in India, and also in Telangana State, Residual Andhra Pradesh State. These musings and reflections do not specifically refer to the diferences of opinion between Shri Katti Mahesh and Shri Paripoornanda Saraswati both of whom live in Hyderabad City, while Shri Mahesh is said to be a native of Chittoor District, and Shri Paripoornanda Saraswati is said to be a Native of Nellore District, both of these Districts being part of Hungry Andhra Pradesh, and Hungry India. But the trigger to me is a TV News Item from Hyderabad, which showed the House Arrest of Shri Paripoornanda Saraswati at his House in Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, one of the Richest Areas in Hyderabad City.

First, I shall give links to the FaceBook Addresses of Shri Paripoornanda Saraswati and Shri Katti Mahesh.
click here to go to https://www.facebook.com/SwamiParipoornanandaOfficial.

I believe that this is the Official FaceBook Page, and not a Fake Facebook page of Shri Paripoornanda Saraswati, as the address itself says "Official". Hence, we can, probably rely on what is written here.

The Official Facebook address of Shri Kathi Mahesh, I believe to be: Click here to go to https://www.facebook.com/mahesh.kathi.

I am giving these Facebook addresses here because, I wanted to study these FaceBook pages so as to get a clearer picture of what the two Thinkers wish to convey to the People of Andhra, People of India, and probably to the People of the World also (there is nothing wrong in it).

The Facebook page of Shri Kathi Mahesh has, a post made two hours back, which I quote below:--

Mahesh Kathi, 3 hrs ·
పరిపూర్ణానంద నగర బహిష్కరణను ఖండిస్తున్నాను. బహిష్కరణలు ఈ సమస్యకు పరిష్కారం కాదు.బహిష్కరణ ఆధునిక ప్రజాస్వామ్య స్ఫూర్తికి విరుద్ధం.మనుషుల్ని "తప్పిస్తే" సమస్యలు తప్పుతాయి అనే ఆటవిక సమాజం దిశగా ప్రభుత్వాలు పయనిస్తే అది తిరోగమనమే అవుతుంది.

Approx. English transl.: I am condemning the Expulsion from City (of Hyderabad City) of Shri Paripoornanda. Expulsions are not solutions for this problem. Expulsions will be against the modern democratic spirit. It will be a retrograde movement, if Governments move towards a Barbaric Societies which consider that Problems will be solved if people are "removed from the scene" (Telugu word: tappistE, I have taken the Contextual meaning).


Sometimes, events move too fast, before we can even throw a cursory glance on them:--
Telugu Editorial lines from Andhrajyothy.comApprox. English Equivalentybrao-a-donkey's views
ఈ రాజకీయాలను కాసేపు పక్కనపెట్టి, కత్తి మహేశ్‌, పరిపూర్ణానందను హైదరాబాద్‌ నగరం నుంచి బహిష్కరించడం గురించి చర్చించుకుందాం! Keeping aside politics for a while, let us discuss about the Externments of (Swami) Paripoornanda and Kathi Mahesh, from Hyderabad City. This Editorial seems to be more interested to praise Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao , rather than discussing the reasonableness of the punishments served on Shri Kathi Mahesh and Swami Paripoornananda . Why so much eagerness to curry favor Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao ?
ఈ ఇరువురికీ నగర బహిష్కరణ విధించడంపై ఎవరి అభిప్రాయాలు ఎలా ఉన్నా, ముఖ్యమంత్రి కేసీఆర్‌ సాహసాన్ని అభినందించకుండా ఉండలేం. Whatever be the views of whoever about the Externments of Mahesh & Paripoornanda from City, We cannot resist from congratulating KCR for his courage. This newspaper has some urgency to congratulate Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao , for reasons known only to it.
కత్తి మహేశ్‌ను బహిష్కరించడం వల్ల దళితులకు తనపై కోపం వస్తుందని గానీ, పరిపూర్ణానందను సాగనంపడం వల్ల హిందువులకు, ముఖ్యంగా బ్రాహ్మణులకు కోపం వస్తుందేమోనని గానీ కేసీఆర్‌ ఆలోచించలేదు. KCR has not thought that by externing Kathi Mahesh, he will incur the wrath of dalits, or that by externing Paripoornanda he will incur the wrath of Hindus, especially, Brahmins. Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao will not think about dalits because as a landlord of Telangana he has scant respect for Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes of Telangana. Proof: How did he deal with the Illegal Sand Mafia having political support, in Nerella Village which tromped over the agitating villagers who were objecting to their sand-ladden trucks encroaching through their village roads, raising enormous dust? What action did he take against the Police Officials who extended endless co-operation to the Mafia? Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao , does not have any consideration towards Brahmins or dalits or anybody who does not own land and wealth. Whatever visits he makes to pilgrim centres and temples, gifts he makes to Gods and Goddesses at State Exchequer's cost, are only superficial, and they arise out of his own guilty-complex.
స్వప్రయోజనాల కోసం ఉద్రిక్తతలను రెచ్చగొట్టడానికి ప్రయత్నించిన ఇరువురిపైనా బహిష్కరణ వేటు వేశారు. ఇరువురూ ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్‌కు చెందినవారు కావడం కూడా ప్రభుత్వానికి కలిసివచ్చింది. Externment struck the both, who have tried to incite emotions (of people) for their own selfish purposes. As both belonged to (Residual) Andhra Pradesh, helped the (Telangana) Government. KCR hated/hates/will hate Andhra People calling them 'andhrOLLu' and thieves. It is his OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder).
చిత్తూరు జిల్లాకు చెందిన కత్తి మహేశ్‌ వైసీపీలో చేరి ఎమ్మెల్యేగా పోటీ చేయాలని భావిస్తున్నట్టు వార్తలు వచ్చాయి. News reports have come that Kathi Mahesh wanted to join YCP (YSR Congress Party) and is considering to contest as MLA. These news reports I could not see, either in Andhrajyothy or elsewhere. Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao is unable to digest a prospect of a dalit (=a dalit who is not a slave of Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao ) contesting as MLA, winning an Election, and speaking in Telangana Assembly, rising some dalit problems, apart from some other important issues. Kathi Mahesh, like Kathi Padma Rao is a powerful orator, and he can present issues vigorously and with great self-confidence. Only thing, in this ybr-a-donkey's view is, he needs to be careful before making too-radical-statements, which may drag him to law courts. He may have to learn from the Experiences of Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi, who had suffered a lot in the hands of our Central Rulers.

He seems to be a person of limited means, as I see on TV Channels, and if that is true, he may need some financial support. I am not a supporter of Jagan or YSRCP. Jagan or YCRCP might have offered him such financial aid in Elections, and Kathi Mahesh might have got tempted to accept it, without knowing that it will be suicidal. Whatever good name he has got hitherto, there is a danger of , being washed away, by joining a Party led by a person who is accused of quidproquo deals of a trillion rupees (Courts will decide that).
ఇక పరిపూర్ణానంద వచ్చే ఎన్నికలలో హైదరాబాద్‌ నగరం నుంచి లోక్‌సభ లేదా శాసనసభకు పోటీ చేయాలనుకోవడం బహిరంగ రహస్యం. It is an open secret that Paripoornanda is intending to contest to Lok Sabha or Assembly from Hyderabad City in the forthcoming Elections. Monks, leaving their monk-y objectives, contesting Elections-- this Issue will have to be examined in depth, in some other blog post of ours. We have seen the rule of Yogi Adityanath as Chief Minister in Uttar Pradesh. Monks, before getting themselves inducted into monkhood, are reported to perform a fire-worship-ritual called 'viraja hOmam', in the course of which they perform their own funerals, obituaries, as a proof of their final determination to "terminate forever" all their body attachments. A true monk is not expected to consider his body as his own. A monk has to shed his attachments-- particularly "sangam (bonds)" , "rAgam (likes)" and "dvEsham (dislikes)". I have great respect to Paripoornananda and Adityanath. Yet, I have to write truths, from my perceptions and perspectives. We cannot see this Spirit of Detachment either in Paripoornanda or in Adityanath. Simply wearing ochre-robes do not make persons sanyAsIs (relinquishers). Such persons will only become ochre-robers, and not monks. True Hindu monks have to forget that their bodies were Hindu, or that they belonged to Hindu Society. Not marrying also does not make persons- monks, while lay people may think that monks make great sacrifices by not marrying.
ఈ ఇరువురుకీ స్పష్టమైన రాజకీయ ఎజెండా ఉన్నందున అవకాశం దొరికిందే తడవుగా కేసీఆర్‌ వారిరువురిపై వేటు వేశారు. As both have clear-cut political agenda, at the first available opportunity, KCr has used his axe on both. KCR will not like powerful rivals.
కత్తి మహేశ్‌ గానీ, పరిపూర్ణానంద గానీ ఈ పరిణామాన్ని ఊహించి ఉండరు. Kathi Mahesh or Paripoornanda might not have anticipated this development. It is like a hunter ignoring the serpant at his feet which is going to bite him, while he aims his arrow to kill a bird. Kathi Mahesh and Paripoornanda are like hunters whose eyes are focused on the bird in the bush, while KCR is the cobra at their feet.
ఇదే పరిపూర్ణానంద నివాసానికి వెళ్లిన ముఖ్యమంత్రి కేసీఆర్‌ ఆయన ఆశీస్సులు తీసుకున్నారు కూడా! Chief Minister KCR went to the house of Shri Paripoornanda and took his blessings. ! Politicians apart from being many other things, are hypocrites also.
స్వాములు స్వాములుగా ఉండకుండా రాజకీయాలు చేయాలనుకుంటే కుదరదని ఈ చర్య ద్వారా ముఖ్యమంత్రి స్పష్టంచేశారు. Through this action, Chief Minister has made clear that, it will not work, if monks do politics, without remaining as monks. Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao believes that his family members alone have a right to sit on the throne. Prof. Kodanda Ram and Gaddar might have already learnt their lessons at the feet of Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao .
ఇక దళితుడికి నగర బహిష్కరణ శిక్ష విధిస్తారా? అని దళిత సంఘాలు గానీ, ఒక స్వామికి ఇదేమి శిక్ష అని ఇతర స్వాములు గానీ, పీఠాధిపతులు గానీ పెద్దగా అభ్యంతరం చెప్పలేని పరిస్థితి. Here is a situation, where Dalit Societies and Unions cannot object saying "How can a dalit be administered a punishment of externment? Here is a situation where other monks and other Monastic Heads cannot largely object saying "What is this punishment for a Monk?" . I do not blame Dalit Societies or Dalit Unions. Dalit Weaknesses all over India give strength to the Ruling Landed Castes in Villages and Cities, to exploit the Poor.
పరిపూర్ణానందకు మద్దతు ప్రకటించిన బీజేపీ నాయకులకు కూడా ఆయన ఎన్నికలలో పోటీ చేయాలనుకోవడం ఇష్టం లేదు. The Bharatiya Janata Party leaders who expressed their support to Paripoornananda also do not like his contesting in Elections. BJP leaders expect some Nominated Posts in Centre, as "Consolation Prizes", even if they lose elections. Example: Maharashtra Governorship to Mr. Vidyasagar Rao. Our Parties in Power are like Crowded General Compartments of Indian Railways. Those who are inside, will not like new-comers to enter the bogeys. They will shout "No space, No space. Go to next bogey!". Envy also plays a role.
నోరు పారేసుకునేవారికి తన రాజ్యంలో ఇటువంటి శిక్షలే ఉంటాయని కేసీఆర్‌ చేసి చూపించారు. Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao has practically demonstrated that in his kingdom, there will be this type of punishments, to those who misuse their mouth. A rude person can never tolerate other rude persons. Proof: He called Mr. Manmohan Singh, a chaprasi. Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao is a tyrant. But, this tiger will be a goat before Asaduddin Owaisi and Akbaruddin Owaisi.
అయితే ఈ ఇరువురి కంటే దారుణమైన వ్యాఖ్యలు చేసిన మజ్లిస్‌ అధినేతలు అసదుద్దీన్‌, అక్బరుద్దీన్‌లపై కూడా ఇలాంటి చర్య తీసుకుంటారా? అన్న ప్రశ్నకు కేసీఆర్‌ నుంచి సమాధానం రావడం లేదు. But, no reply is forthcoming, from Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao, to the question whether he will take a similar action against the Majlis Leaders Mr. Asaduddin, Akbaruddin (Owaisi-s) who have made comments far worser than those made by these two people (Kathi Mahesh & Paripoornanda). Mr. K. Chandrasekhar Rao , like other Landed Caste Leaders of Telangana Villages, is a slave of Nizam.


This is incomplete. This will be completed shortly, with more additions / deletions / modifications / corrections if somebody's sentiments are hurt.