752 (Part 5/10 of US Elections) Why does Mr. Trump and his Party need $ 1 billion?

Mr. Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican Nominee for American Presidential Elections 2016, is reported to have said that he would mobilise $ 1 billion for his party, to meet his Campaign expenses and also for the rest of the General Elections, so that the Republicans manage majority in both the House and the Senate. United States of America is, today, the most indebted Nation in the World. The foolish World is bearing United States extravagance helplessly, because it is unable to find a better country than USA, and a better currency than American Dollar, for (securely?) depositing their Exchange Reserves. Nor this foolish World is able to work out an efficient and effective organisation to manage international settlements both short term and long term, international debt both short and long term.

Here is what Mr. Donal Trump is reported to have said:

"...I am raising money for the party. I am also going to continue spending money on myself. I think, I will raise a lot. I think, it is going to be a billion. I will raise whetever we need...".

"...I shall raise the money for the rest of the general elections so that the party can retain its majority in both the House and the Senate. ..."

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

Why does Mr. Donald Trump need a billion dollar for his , and his party's Campaign? Why he cannot manage frugally? Are they going to bribe voters to vote, and to vote for Republicans? Mr. Trump is promising to build a Great America ! How can a fund-guzzler and spending-obsessed prodigal can manage the funds of the World's largest Economy? How can an extravagant Nation become Great?

During the caucuses and primaries of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, voters have already discussed the substantially the merits and demerits of all the candidates. What is there to publicise now? Is there anything left out, which the American voters do not know?

If Trump and Republicans alone are going to mobilise $ 1 billion, how can Hillary Clinton, and the Democrats lag behind? They will also collect $ 1 billion and burn! Besides, the Federal Government of United States, and the 50 State Governments of the United States, are going to spend large amounts for conducting the elections. If every expense is aggregated, the total amount which Americans are going to burn will reach $ 10 billion.

Since, now United States is the largest debtor of the World, and the US Dollar is expected to be a Responsible currency, being a Reserve Currency, the headaches of USA are going to be the headaches of the whole World.

Hence, outsiders are concerned about what is happening in USA .

Subject to corrections and deletions. A lot more is to be added. To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

721 Mr. Sanders will have to turn the page and learn the work. He can look back to Abraham Lincoln.

2016 American President Elections. Mr. Bernie Sanders, rival to Ms. Hillary Clinton to get Democratic Nomination, cannot any longer delay his reply to Time.Com, which has raised some important questions about acceptance of High Dollar funds from Lobbyists, Pressure Groups. Here is a link to the Time.com How Convention Costs Put Bernie Sanders in a Bind- by Zeke J Miller @ZekeJMiller 12th Apr 2016. (Click to go to Time.Com.) .

Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders has scored political points off his rival’s high-dollar fundraising, while lambasting the influence of the “a handful of billionaires, their super PACs and their lobbyists” in the American political process.

But should he win the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders stands to be the beneficiary of the same largesse he targets on the campaign trail.

Sanders has not responded to repeated questions from TIME over several months about whether he would ask the Democratic National Committee to stop raising money from federal lobbyist money or PACs if he is the nominee, as well as whether he would return corporate funds solicited for the convention.

The gist of the question will lead to a dilemma: If Mr. Sanders gets Democratic Nomination, will he avail of the High-Dollar funds raised by Ms. Hillary Clinton from Corporates and Lobbyists? All the time, he has been criticising his Rival, that she is mobilising funds from Corporates and Lobbyists.

In other words, the dilemma is practising, what is preached.

Without high-dollar funds from Democratic National Committee, it appears as though Mr. Sanders cannot fight the super-rich Trump. If Mr. Sanders uses the high-dollar funds, he will become cheap in the eyes of the voters.

When I discussed this predicament of Mr. Sanders, with a friend of mine, he suggested that Mr. Sanders should turn the page and learn the Work. By "turn the page", he meant that Sanders should turn the pages of history and find out what Mr. George Washington, Mr. Abraham Lincoln, Mr. Franklin Roosevelt et al had done, when they faced crises.

According to me, among the three Presidents mentioned above, I could not believe that Messrs. George Washington and Franklin Roosevelt could face a funds crises. They might have fought their electoral battles on equal play-fields. Mr. Abraham Lincoln might have faced this problem, but I am unable to trace any historical records.

But, the Gettisburg Address of Lincoln showed his courage of convictions. and his preparedness to face challenges, including a Civil War. Now, Mr. Bernie Sanders will not face anything like a Civil War situation, but, there is a danger of Mr. Trump outmanoeuvreing him.

The problem with Mr. Sanders seems to be, though he is making facades of a "Socialist" and a "fighter against the Wall Street", he seems to have already compromised on the issue, though he is not announcing it to the outside world. In the 240 years of American History, none of the American Presidents had to fight that type of a Virtual Civil War, which can lead to more far reaching consequences than the Real Military Civil War of the Lincoln Days. If Mr. Sanders decides to face the Corporate World with a straight sword, he will become the First American President to become the Champion of the people in gutters.

Had Mr. Sanders foreseen such possibilities, he ought to have started his preliminary campaign itself as a very very low cost Campaign. At every stage, he ought to have cut expenditure by 75% of the normal spendings.

But, one thing appears to be true. He did what which the previous Campaigners never bothered about. HERE is a quote from vetsforbernie.org which reports that Bernie Sanders paid overtime to Marshal Town Police for the security arrangements. (Click to go to go to vetsforbernie.org.)

IOWA (VFB) — When Presidential candidates come to town, local police departments spring into action to ensure not only that candidate’s safety, but the safety of the public and everyone involved. Substantial time and resources are spent planning and executing such events, which if not reimbursed by the campaigns, must be covered by local taxpayers.

"...I think a lot of people just assume that those costs are being reimbursed, and they aren’t," Marshalltown, IA Police Chief Mike Tupper, told me over the phone Tuesday afternoon.

"...I am happy to report that Bernie Sanders paid."

"...Not only did Sanders pay, 'He actually asked up front how much, and he paid those costs, which makes him the first candidate to do so in my 23 years [of law enforcement in Iowa].' Not only did Sanders pay, "...He actually asked up front how much, and he paid those costs, which makes him the first candidate to do so in my 23 years [of law enforcement in Iowa]. ..."

Hence, we need not doubt the sincerity and integrity of Mr. Sanders. Yet, there is a problem. If he accepts Corporate Funds, after winning Elections, he cannot harden his stance towards them. His softness, will make him a piece of butter for the Corporate knives.

Apart from Electoral funding, even if there is no need of electoral funding, Heads of State and , Heads of Government cannot today avoid the Corporates altogether, until TRUE AND COMPLETE SOCIALISM is implemented in TOTO. Even after execution, the Heads will have to face the problem of providing Essential needs i.e. food, clothing, shelter, education, health care to the citizen. As long as Socialist Nations can produce all their needs in STATE SECTOR, WITHIN THE COUNTRY, the Socialist Citizens will be happy.

But, for numerous reasons such as crop failures, natural calamities, political upheavals in neighboring countries, every country whether Socialist or Capitalist is bound to face domestic shortages, which are to be met through imports.

If Socialist Citizens can live happily, limiting their demands and needs to the bearest, a Socialist Nation can survive. But the neighboring Capitalist countries will not allow a Socialist country to exist. It will be an eyesore for them. There is no place for "contentment and satisfaction" in Capitalist countries. Nor they can tolerate such "contentment and satisfaction" which does not exist in their own countries, to exist in Socialist countries.

Anyway, let Mr. Sanders cross the first post, i.e. win the Democratic Nomination.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

700 A Goldman Sach Lady Executive couldn't digest the fact that Nanny of her Children, is a Socialist, and that she supported Bernie Sanders.

I have great sympathies for Mr. Bernie Sanders. But I have no hopes on his getting Democratic Party's Nomination or his getting elected as the American President. Even if he gets elected, he cannot fulfil his promises to People. Here is a link to a peculiar situation of CLASS STRUGGLES, which he cannot solve. Link: Click to go to http://www.dailykos.com/stories/1403150/full_content . At this dailykos.com, you will find a question raised by a Lady Executive of Goldman Sach, that her Nannie subscribed to the Campaign of Bernie Sanders. She was a supporter of Republican Contestant Mr. Ted Cruz. The Executive said that she found, that the Nanny of the Children of Mr. Ted Cruz and Mrs. Heidi Cruz , has contributed to the Campaign of Mr. Cruz. The Executive could not bear the idea of Nanny of her children being a Socialist. We have to particularly note the adjective used by her: "outlandish ideas did the socialist nanny install into their little heads?" 2. The Lady Executive of the Goldman Sach, sought advice from Dailycos.Com. The reply given by Pollyanna (may be the Administrator of the site) is also worth studying and interesting.

Dear Pollyanna: I’m a Goldman Sachs exec and mother to my three beautiful children (ages: 12, 10, and 8). Yesterday morning, like every quarter, we had a top-exec meeting where we went through presidential campaigns filings to check the names of individual donors to different candidates. Majority of us contributed to Jeb, of course, and the other part gave to Ted Cruz – we all love his wife, our own, Heidi Cruz. The atmosphere in the room was cheerful and celebratory; both Jeb and Ted have raised lots of money. Suddenly a wave of terror hit me: I saw the name of my kids’ nanny on a list of donors to Bernie Sanders. I let a socialist nanny around my children! All shaken, I left the room and did a quick search: unlike mine, the nanny for Heidi Cruz’s kids donated the max $2700 to the Cruz campaign! What a humiliation! Just a few days ago we met them in Colorado Springs where my husband and I spent a lot of time with Heidi and Ted talking about proper ways to raise our children in this age of moral decline and government overreach. Both nannies – Cruz’s and ours - were there involved in the conversation and taking care of our children. And now it turns out our nanny is a socialist! I’m shocked – how could we put our kids into such a dangerous condition? What outlandish ideas did the socialist nanny install into their little heads? Whatever that would be, do you think it can be reversed? Should we warn Heidi and Ted that their kids have been exposed to a socialist every time we met together over the years? Please, help!

Desperate GS Exec

Dear Desperate GS Exec: As parents your overlook is serious but damages to your kids will be seen in full spectrum only after they reach voting eligibility age. However, there is still some time to correct what was done wrong. Calm and cool assessment of the acquired habits is necessary. Respond to these questions and apply corrections where needed: 1) While feeding your kids, did the socialist nanny just put the food and water in front of them, or did she make your kids fight with each other for the products? 2) During kids’ sickness, did the socialist nanny just take care of them, or did she make them pay her with their allowances for her care? 3) Finally, during the course of a normal day, did the socialist nanny oversee and regulate any kind of situations your kids were involved in, or did she leave your kids all alone? A socialist nanny in your environment is always an incapacitating agent. Inform your friends who had contact with her and stay positive – you caught the problem right in time.

Pollyanna

For those who wish to see how Conservatives view "Socialism" as a Devil, here is a link. Link: Click to go to Townhall.Com. .

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

As per the above, supporting Capitalism is supposed to be "inlandish" for United States, whereas supporting Socialism is considered as "outlandish". It is not clear, whether Goldman Sach's Executives alone consider that SOCIALISM IS OUTLANDISH , or majority of Voters in U.S. consider socialism outlandish?

Suggested Reading: Download pdf of the 1949 American play "Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller, 125 pages. Here is the link: Click to go to download 125 page play "Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller.

Subject to substantial Revision, additions and deletions. To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.