779 Musings on the advice of Mr. Subramanian Swamy to BJP Leadership about Indian Ministers wearing suits and looking like WAITERS, and Robert Vadras response to it

Mr. Subramanian Swamy is reported to have tweeted: "...BJP should direct our Ministers to wear traditional and modernised Indian clothes while abroad. In coat and tie they look like waiters. — Subramanian Swamy (@Swamy39) June 24, 2016". A reply for this atrocious tweet has come from an unexpected quarters, Mr. Robert Vadra, the son-in-law of Ms. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President, and the De-facto Ruler of India 2004-2014. Reply: "...So is there no dignity in being a Waiter ?! The attention seeking BJP MP Swamy's comment "Ministers who wear a coat and tie “look like waiters” and must be instructed to wear Indian clothes." Undermining waiters who work hard for a living; making condescending and derogatory remarks about them is deplorable and classist...

Now, it is the turn of Mr. Subramanian Swamy to wield his sword of words:

"People giving me unasked for advice of discipline and restraint don't realise that if I disregard discipline there would be a bloodbath."

I said I am the most disciplined person. If I was indisciplined, there would not be what they called as bloodshed. Bloodshed did not mean blood spilling. Bloodshed means there will be chaos. And I said that because I am disciplined, nothing of that kind happened,

"... I think Mr.Vadra should concentrate on staying out of jail and not comment on political issues: Subramanian Swamy pic.twitter.com/Lq3GWh5nDN. ... — ANI (@ANI_news) June 25, 2016".

Here is a link for those who wish to study this exchange of dialogues between Mr. Subramanian Swamy and Mr. Robert Vadra. Click to go to Firstpost.com, to study their report.

According to the FirstPost's web page linked above, Mr. Swamy's tweet apparently intended a reference to Mr. Arun Jaitley's wearing a lounge suit when he met in China, Bank of China's Chairman Tian Guoli. Mr. Swamy's advice is to BJP's Leaders.

Later, Mr. Swamy praised the dress of Mr. Arun Jaitley. It may be some reconciling exercise.

WHY DID IT PROBABLY HURT MR. ROBERT VADRA?

It seems that Mr. Robert Vadra's Mother had worked as a Waitress in Italy in the past.

Besides, Mr. Swamy has made allegations of corruption against Mr. Robert Vadra, saying

"... Vadra made a lot of money, it is called the Vadra school of management, but the dean of that school was (Haryana CM Bhupinder Singh) Hooda. He has to be prosecuted under Prevention of Corruption Act. ..."

The alert caution given by Mr. Swamy to Mr. Vadra "I think Mr.Vadra should concentrate on staying out of jail" is referring to the allegations of his fraudulent land deals in Hariyana and Rajasthan. This caution is somewhat acerbic.

Thus, Mr. Swamy's comments seem to be hurling stones against everybody at random, and sometimes deliberate against selected individuals. Anyway he is very active since the 2014 victory of BJP, like a tiger on a prowl.

Many people love wearing impressive dresses, sometimes to boost the personal image of themselves within themselves (like that when a person looks into a mirror and congratulates himself), and sometimes to impress others. As the practice is universal, it is difficult to regard it as something totally undesirable.



In the early days of his annointment to the Crown of India, Mr. Narendra Modi- PM of India, also showed a penchant to wear suits.

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

Mr. Subramanian Swamy seems to have nursed a desire to become Finance Minister in the Cabinet of Mr. Narendra Modi, probably in 2014 itself. Of course, in spite of his maverick methods and weirdo ways, afterall, like Mr. Raghuram Rajan, Mr. Swamy is also a Professor, and an Economist of Harvard Recognition. If at all he has nursed such ambition or desire or wish, there is nothing wrong in it, anyway I am not here to pass value judgements. But, somehow, Mr. Narendra Modi preferred Mr. Arun Jaitley as Finance Minister, a Lawyer by Profession.

BRIEF COMPARISON OF MR. JAITLEY AND MR. SWAMY

A comparison of Mr. Arun Jaitley and Mr. Subramanian Swamy may need a 100 pages to write about. Prima facie, it appears that Mr. Arun Jaitley is a successful Supreme Court lawyer, is professionally a pecuniary-conquerer in the context of the 21st Century Values, and financially a business-moolah earner, practical-and-pragmatic professional owing to overexposure to Indian Business, Corporate and Legal Environment, whereas Mr. Subramanian Swamy is a scholarly-professor (I do not want to call him pedantic which is a derogatory adjective) knowledgeable person, with a legal bent of mind arguing his own cases, but apparently he is not a business-man running businesses, acquiring gold, real estate etc. His wealth might have been based either his family-inheritances or his wife-herself-a-Supreme-Court Advocate's acquisitions. What I mean to say is, that Mr. Swamy may not have a money-earning bent of mind , which seems to be a prerequisite for a Finance Minister of Capitalist Environments. At the same time, he is not a Sanyasi or Muni. Mr. Swamy seems to be a bird of DIFFERENT FEATHERS, distinct FROM THE FEATHERS OF Mr. Narendra Modi or Mr. Arun Jaitely. Nevertheless, like Mr. Jaitley, he too seems to have Corporate Links and Corporate Support, though may not be on the same magnitude and scale as Mr. Jaitley.

Question: Why Mr. Modi did not take Mr. Swamy into Cabinet in 2014, and entrusted him some other Ministry, if not Finance. Why did he entrust it to a novice like Ms. Sitaraman? Will he take Mr. Swamy into Cabinet now?

Ans: Vajpayee, our First BJP Prime Minister, took Mr. Swamy into his 1999-2004 Cabinet, and gave him Commerce Ministry. Mr. Narendra Mody too ought to have done a similar thing in 2014. But, Mr. Narendra Modi seems to have some marked preferences for novices like Ms. Sitaraman, Ms. Smriti Irani, when compared to Seniors like Mr. Swamy, Mr. Arun Shourie et al., because Seniors may have "their own views" and their own "self-esteem". They may not show obedience of required magnitude. About Mr. Modi taking Mr. Swami into Cabinet now: Mr. Modi's advisers i.e. Mr. Arun Jaitley, Mr. Ameet Shaw, Mr. Mohan Bhagavat RSS Chief, may have to give green signal. The green signal may come,or may not come.

Like Mr. Raghuram Rajan, Mr. Arvind Subramanian,-- Mr. Subramanian Swamy is also a bourgeoisie economist of the Harvard, IMF and London Schools. As already pointed out in our blogpost No. 776 Click to read 776, these are all only bourgeoisie fibs and fisticuffs. We need not bother about them much. We have to focus more on Socialist Economics, and Socialist Economists (that tribe is too small).

For those who wish to read about Prof. Subramanian Swamy's wish, here is an interview: Click here if you wish to study Mr. Swamy's Interview to TelegraphIndia.com at their website.



Mr. Narendra Modi is very fond of wearing dresses, head-gear, hats, turbans, suits, coats, kurtas. The criticism which Mr. Narendra Modi received, when he appeared in a very expensive suit gifted to him by his one of his admirers , -- on the occasion of his welcoming U.S. President Barack Obama in Delhi, has made him to shed the suit, get it auctioned, and money donated for charity. But his tryst with great-expensive-dressing continues, notwithstanding his chaiwallah background, in spite of his displayed affinity to the renunciation of Swami Vivekananda. Apart from self-declared renunciations, they have the common factor of love for coats, though Vivekananda was addicted to cigars, while Mr. Narendra Modi is not. Vivekananda was a fan of non-vegetarian food, while Mr. Modi displays his love for vegetarian food.

Now, Prof. Subramanian Swamy has to clarify whether his preaching "...BJP should direct our Ministers to wear traditional and modernised Indian clothes while abroad. In coat and tie they look like waiters. — Subramanian Swamy (@Swamy39) June 24, 2016" will apply to Mr. Narendra Modi also?

In all fairness to Mr. Swamy, whatever be his other strengths and weaknesses, he is prima facie, reasonably meticulous about his wearing INdian style dresses. I am unable to trace even a single photo on internet which shows Mr. Swamy in his Western Suit. However, like most political leaders of India, he too seems to be very particular in appearing as an IMPECCABLY DRESSED PERSON. Though Swami Vivekananda was credited with a repartee of conversation whereby he highlighted the importance of character, when compared to dress--

“Can't you wear proper clothes to look like a gentleman?”

Swami Vivekananda smiled and said, “In your culture, a tailor makes a gentleman; but, in our culture, Character makes gentleman.”

--Swami Vivekananda too, while in United States and Europe spent money and time on impeccable dressing. (Mahatma Gandhi and Tanguturi Prakasam seem to have reversed this trend in India).

We shall now go back to the end-19th Century years of United States and Swami vivEkAnanda. Swamiji wrote to Alasinga from Metclaff, Mass. on 20.8.1893:

From this village I am going to Boston tomorrow. I am going to speak at a big Ladies' Club here, which is helping Ramabai. I must first go and buy some clothing in Boston. If I am to live longer here, my quaint dress will not do. People gather by hundreds in the streets to see me. So what I want is to dress myself in a long black coat, and keep a red robe and turban to wear when I lecture. This is what the ladies advise me to do, and they are the rulers here, and I must have their sympathy. Before you get this letter my money would come down to somewhat about £70 of £60. So try your best to send some money. It is necessary to remain here for some time to have any influence here.

In the same letter quote:

"...Just now I have been to the tailor and ordered some winter clothings, and that would cost at least Rs. 300 and up. And still it would not be good clothes, only decent. Ladies here are very particular about a man's dress, and they are the power in this country...."

By the 1893 price levels, a sum of Rs. 300 and up must have been very high for vivEkAnanda's fancy and alasinga's back (because he had to send the money to vivEkAnanda). Poor alasinga had to bear this burden, because he had to enable vivEkAnanda to have influence with the American big ladies, who advise him to wear what and win their sympathies. alasinga should save vivEkAnanda from looking queer. Can't a monk have courage to face crowds? Ans: An ascetic or monk should not be afraid of looking queer or unnatural. Whatever way the onlookers may see him or mock at him, a true ascetic will not take their actions and reactions into cognizance.

It is worth quoting bhartruhari here, the great poet of the first millennium India gave birth to:

Sanskrit: camd`aaloo kim ayam? dvijaatir athavaa s`uudroo atha? kim taapasaha?
kim vaa tattva viveeka pees`ala matir yogiis`varaha koo api kim?
iti utpanna vikalpa jalpa mukharair aabhaashyamaan`aa janair
na kruddhaupathi naiva tusht`a manasoo yaanti svayam yoginaha .96

English: Those who see the ascetic on the path, will be wondering who this person is! Is he an outcast? Is he a Priest? Is he of a low caste? A person doing penance? A scholarly saint who can distinguish between strains of principles of philosophy? Who ever he is? The passersby will be estimating and commenting about him. But the ascetic himself will not get irritated and in a contented and serine mode he proceeds. (vairAgya Satakam verse No. 96.)

SOMETHING YBRAO-A-DONKEY'S PERSONAL (autobiographical)

Sorry for writing personal stuff. But, the initial purpose of blogs in their early days was to write about personal web-logs, a sort of personal diaries. Gradually, the element of personal experiences vanished from the scene. May be because, blog-writers felt "Who will read your personal fetishes, unless you are a celebrity film-star, Head of a State or Head of a Government or some billionnaire?".

I am writing something personal, whatever it is worth for. In 1976 while working in a Bank, I was preparing for a job-promotion interview. My office colleagues and my immediate superior-bosses advised me to attend the job-interview in a suit. The general impression prevailing then was that impeccable dress is important in job interviews. According to them, it creates a good first impression.

In my life till then (1950/1-1976), I did never wear a suit, or tie or shoes. From 1950 to 1968 I was without any footwear, walking with bare feet even in hot summer or on thorny paths. My family could not afford to buy comforts or luxuries like chappals, not to write of school shoes. About these things, some other day, in some other blog post, I shall write separately.

I was unwilling to buy ties and suits just for the sake of two interviews. Nor there was time to get suits stitched (in those days readymade suits were not so much popular). My uncle borrowed a suit from a colleague of his, and helped me, teaching me to wear a tie and the coat.

I appeared the two job-interviews in suit, with a tie around my neck like vAsuki around Lord Shiva (sorry for an audacious and arrogant simile). In one interview, I failed because my job-knowledge was poor. I could not reply anything satisfactorily. Besides, suit was suffocating me, though there was A/C in the interview room.

In the second interview too, I failed because I had an argument with the Head of the Interviewing board and others, about Socialism and Rural Poverty. At that time, I was immature, emotionally, and not a practical person (even now, presumably I am not a practical person). It was my natural trait to argue on socio-economic issues even with slightest provocation and stimulus. Another observation: The top-boss heading the interview board was wearing a open-shirt of short-sleeves, while I was suffocating in borrowed suit. This made me nervous, and self-introspective, disjoined my chain of thoughts.

So, thus, the suit did not help in both the instances. Impressions created by "suits" and "impeccable dresses" are not substitutes for ESSENTIALS to fulfil any task. Next year, I again succeeded in written tests, and appeared another interview in my shabby dress, but with improved job-knowledge, control of emotions. Succeeded, notwithstanding shabby dress. Subsequently, even after becoming an Officer, I have never bought, borrowed or worn a tie or a suit or shoes.

HOW TRADE UNIONS AND WORKERS' ASSOCIATIONS CAN INFLUENCE BEHAVIORS OF MEMBERS

In our Bank, in 1970's, Officers used to wear ties regularly and routinely. In addition to that, they used to store COATS in Office cupboard, and when they were called by top-bosses on any work, they used to take out the coats from cupboards, wear the coats, and then only enter the Chambers of the top-bosses.

In one particular year, their Association gave a call of Non-Cooperation, and advised its members to temporarily stop wearing ties and suits, during the currency of their agitation.

The members stopped wearing suits and ties permanently, even while entering into the rooms of top-bosses.

CONCLUSION

Whatever we do externally (conversations, dresses, etiquette, feasting, hosting, etc. etc.) to impress others and bring them into a favourable disposition towards us, the end result will depend on circumstances, environment, situations, numerous other deciding factors, relating to both us and them. Mr. Narendra Modi and Mr. Xi Jinping sat and swang in a swing, in a friendly mode. But, DID IT DETER Mr. Xi Jinping from blocking the entry of India into NSG Group, quoting some rule!! It did not deter, because they are ALL trivial, when it comes to BUSINESSLIKE BEHAVIORS of individuals, Corporates and Organisations, and Heads of Nations and Governments. This is a world of Lucre!

So, what is the use of Mr. Subramanian Swamy bringing in the issue of "WAITERS" into picture, and make them a subject of comparison, to BJP Ministers visiting abroad and trying to impress their foreign hosts?

It is hightime that Prof. Subramanian Swamy recognises the dignity of labor of WAITERS and stop making comparisons which insult them.

When an intellectual upgradation of Proletariat (Working Class) takes place-- this is a dream, I hope that Professors will also be given a few hours of physical labor every day, working inter-alia as WAITERS, COOKS, AND DISH-CLEANERS. They can be given a three hour duty of cooking in Community Kitchens, and serving in Community Hostels, while reducing their LECTURING TIME.

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

665 You are my paternal aunt. How can I do this to you?

In my mother tongue, Telugu language, there is a proverb "sagam peTTi mEnatta anTE ela?". Its approx. English gist is based on a small anecdote: Once a nephew and a paternal aunt (father's sister) had a love affair, with a sexual intercourse. In most Regional sub-cultures of India, sex with paternal aunt is a moral taboo, and a sort of incest, though may not be absolute legal incest. This nephew, after half-penetration, suddenly got a moral dilemma and said "You are my mEnatta (paternal aunt). How can I do this to you?". He wanted to withdraw. This proverb, though somewhat obscene and un-parliamentary, has an important message, "Either we should have things in full, or not have them at all'.

What Late Jawaharlal Nehru, the First Prime Minister of India, and Late Indira Gandhi, the Second Prime Minister of India with Socialist Pretentions, did to India was the same thing. Though Late Jawaharlal Nehru pronounced that PUblic Sector in India will reach Commanding Heights, he did not do enough to introduce True Socialism in India. Either it may be his half-heartedness, or it may be teething problems which nascent independent India faced, or headaches like Jammu Kashmir, Goa, Pondicherry, or it may be non-cooperation from his Finance Ministers such as Morarji Desai, and T.T. Krishnamachary. Late Chakravartula Rajagopalachary (Rajaji) too might have resisted it.

As far as I can recollect, it was Mrs. Indira Gandhi, who got the word "Socialist" inserted into the Indian Preamble of the INdian Constitution. Though she has taken some courageous steps like Nationalisation of Banks, Insurance Companies and Nationalisation of Petroleum Companies, she did not go beyond populism. Total Removal of Private Property, Abolition of Stock Exchanges, Abolition of Currency System, Abolition of Private Trade and Industry, also ought to have been tried. It may be too much for us to expect that she would abolish Family System to emancipate Women from Family work, Abolition of Family System. She herself visited Babas to get blessings.

Whatever half-half things were done with various motives, gradually, P.V. Narasimha Rao and Mr. Manmohan Singh tried to UNDO, and take credit for it.

For this reason only, the above reference to the Telugu Proverb "sagam peTTi mEnatta" has become apt. Now, Readers will see! Mr. Bernie Sanders (Democratic Contender for the American Presidency), Mr. Jeremy Corbyn (England's Labor Party Leader), Mr. Alexis Tsipras (Prime Minister of Greece), all fall in this "sagam peTTi mEnatta" category.

Mr. Barack Obama eight years back raised GREAT EXPECTATIONS worldwide. What happened? Now, eight years elapsed. The US is at the same place, where it was eight years back.

The US will be at the same place in 2020, where it is in 2016, whether Mr. Bernie Sanders will win the Election or not. Even if Donald Trump wins the Elections, still US will be at the same place. Reason: They are just two cogs in a big machine. If they try too hard, they will be caught in some pinion wheel. Though they may not be assassinated physically, they will be made mentally imbecile. Besides, most Americans at least, as on date, do not appear to believe in the efficacy of True Socialism as a cure for all the viruses of Capitalism. Yet, they may elect Mr. Bernie Sanders, with a "small-boundary-limit" that he will not exceed their brief and will not go too far. They too want "sagam peTTi mEnatta".



Yet to be written. I shall write tomorrow.

To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.

653 Part 1 of, Is India (of course Telangana and Residual Andhra Pradesh) ruled by astrologers? भाग १, क्या भारत ज्योतिषोंं से परिपालित हो रहा है ? భాగం 1, భారత దేశం, జ్యోతిష్కుల చేత పరిపాలించ బడుతున్నదా ?

Shri N. Ramana Rao, an employee of B.S.N.L., in Hyderabad, is reported to have counselled Mr. Y. Jaganmohan Reddy that he would become Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh within three years. This gentleman also claimed credit for predicting that Barack Obama would win his 2008 and 2013 outings to the White House. This pandit also claimed that he just magnified the palm of Obama from his photos. Shri Ramana Rao also claimed to have predicted the ascendence of Shri Pranab Mukherjee to the Presidential Throne of India.

The following web page shows some of the claims and predictions of Shri Ramana Rao. For those who wish to study them, here is the link to click: Click to go to NRItoday.net, page 1103.

This web page quotes an averment of Shri Ramana Rao:

I do not charge a penny for these pre­dictions and seek no favors from politicians who flock to my house. I want to use the pow­ers for the good of the people and also fore­warn those who come in the wheel of bad luck. If YSR had avoided the helicopter journey he would have survived and done a lot of good for the state. His son Jagan Mohan Reddy con­sults me after this unfortunate incident and he has the potential to rule the state with a thump­ing majority,

Telugu Language: "...నేను ఈ భవిష్యత్ దర్శనాలకు ఒక పైసా కూడా ఛార్జి చేయను. నా ఇంటి చుట్టూ మూగే రాజకీయ నేతలనుండి ఎలాటి ఉపకారాలనూ కోరను. నా శక్తులను నేను లోకోపకారానికే వాడాలని కోరుతున్నాను. దురదృష్ట చక్రంలో పడపోయే వారికి ముందు హెచ్చరిక చేద్దామనే నా లక్ష్యం. (నేను హెచ్చరించిన విధంగా, వైయస్ రాజశేఖర్ రెడ్డి ఆ హెలీకాప్టర్ యాత్రను మానేసి ఉంటే, రాష్ట్రానికి ఎంతో మంచి జరిగి ఉండేది. ఆ దురదృష్ట సంఘటన తరువాత (హెలికాప్టర్ ప్రమాదంలో వై యస్ మరణం తరువాత) ఆయన కుమారుడు జగన్మోహన రెడ్డి నన్ను సంప్రదిస్తూ ఉన్నారు. ఆయన (జగన్), ఈ రాష్ట్రాన్ని తంపింగ్ మెజారిటీ తో పాలించ గల పొటెన్షియల్ గల వాడు. ..."

ybrao-a-donkey's personal opinion: If Late Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy, had avoided the helicopter journey and saved himself from the accident as forewarned by Mr. Ramana Rao, Mr. YSR would have made another Rs. 100,000 crore (Rs. 1 trillion) for his son Jagan. That way, Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy is a loser, and the States of Telangana and Residual Andhra Pradesh were gainers of Rs. 1 trillion.

According to Hindu scriptures, what is destined for a person cannot be stopped by fore-warnings. Forewarnings cannot prevent the Non-Existing God's decisions. Proof: Scripture: Maha Bhagavata of Sage Vyasa. Story of Emperor Parikshit, Son of Abhimanyu. A Sage cursed King Parikshit that he would die in 7 days by a snake bite. Parikshit built an in-penetratable impregnable tall tower and insulated himself from all sides with no windows and ventilators. The snake which was to bite him as per Sage's curse had hidden itself in a micro-sized form in a fruit. A Sage, visited the insulated tower of Parikshit, and unknowingly gifted him the particular fruit in which the killer-snake was hiding. Unsuspectingly, Parikshit opened the fruit and was instantaneously bit by the snake and killed. The saving grace for Parikshit was, he attained Liberation from the Cycle of Births and Deaths (mOksha- a Hindu belief), because he was, all the seven days listening to the Stories of Lord Vishnu, narrated by Sage Suka. This is the important theme of one of the Trinity of the Hindu Scriptures, Mahabhagavatam.

Late Mr. Raja Sekhara Reddy was a devotee of Jerusalem God (if Yehova is not different from VishNu, as believed by aliens, because the general belief among lay persons and clerics, is-- "Different Gods exist for different Religions", and it is the reason for Conversions indulged in by Christian Missionaries in India with Foreign Funds. Otherwise, there should be no need to convert people in the name of running Schools and Hospitals.), and his wife and daughter Sharmila also carry Bible with great conviction. However, Mr. Rajasekhara Reddy visited the prayer houses of all Religions. Then we should say that Lord Yehova or VishNU might have saved Mr. Rajasekhara Reddy, from the sins of accumulating another Rs. 1 trillion, for giving Jagan, Bharati, and their Offsprings, through the Quid pro Quo administrative techniques.

This NRItoday.net web page has given the website address of Shri Ramana Rao. But, it is not a link. According to this Webpage, Shri Ramana Rao does not charge anything for his Services. He is doing Service to the Society. Welcome. Why should we find fault?

Click to go to Fateinface.com, the website of Shri Ramana Rao.

By error, I typed facetoface.com in the address box and collided into a hardporn page whose trademark is "FACEtoFACE where couples meet", which claims to have complied with some American Regulation "...18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement...".

ybrao-a-donkey is neither a porno lover or a porno hater. Porno is omnipresent, omniscient, like the God. Once we go for browsing, whether we like it or not, whether we search for them or not, pornos will squeeze us through. We are not Rishya Sringas. Nor do we wear Chastity Belts. (In Telugu language: ఇనుప కచ్చడాల్ గట్టుకొను మునిమ్రుచ్చులెల్ల తామరస నేత్రలిండ్ల బందీలుగారే? English equivalent: Won't those Sages who wear iron chastity belts, become prisoners in the houses of lotus-eyed damsels?). But, there seems to be no gender-equality at this site. Why only female images? And not male images? Anyway, this subject of "Porno analyses" for Indians (including ybrao-a-donkey), will need a thousand pages. This is not the right place. We shall take up separately.

Sorry for the deviation. Back to our BSNL Astrologer.

Typing the correct web address, we, shall now be, at the Fateinface.com. Its home page has some photo of Shri Ramana Rao with Indian Celebrities.

1. Shri Ramana Rao, with our BJP Bhishma on ampa Sayya (bed of arrows on which Bhishma lied down upon, awaiting Northern Solstice and makara sankramaNam (Sun's entry into Capricorn), i.e. our Lal Krishna Advaniji.

ybrao-a-donkey's observation: It is not clear when they met, i.e. before Shri Modi Mahoday ditched Advani and Murali Manohar Joshiji, or after the sabotage? What did Shri Ramana Rao predict for Advani? Did it come true?

Then, there is a photo of Shri Ramana Rao with Shri Raman Singh, Chief Minister of Chattisgadh. What did our astrologer predicted for him?

Another photo with Shri Abhishekh Singh, M.P. Rajnandagaon.

Another photo with Mr. Sandeep Marwah - President of the World Peace Development and Research Foundation. New Delhi, Noida.

A photo with Shri Deve Gowda, Former Prime Minister of India.

A scan of a journal titled "Country & Politics", with the note: Deciphering the future With the blessings of Mahaavtar Babaji.

Now, we shall go to Shri Mahaavtar Babaji.

Here is the Wikipaedia link: Click to go to Wikipaedia.org/wiki/Mahavatar_babaji. . According to Wikipaedia's entry, MahAvtAr bAbAji was born in 203 CE (slightly earlier than the Sangam literature period in Tamil Nadu's parangipettai.). His original name was said to be NAgarAjan. There are some references to Paramahamsa YOgAnanda, and his Work "Autobiography of a Yogi".



Mr. Nitish Kumar, the 2016 Chief Minister of Bihar, in his election Campaigns, mocked at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on 2nd Nov. 2015.

"... I met an aughad (occultist) without hiding from anybody in daylight... But news reports showed Narendra Modi allegedly meeting astrologer Bejan Daruwala. You are talking a lot about jantar-mantar against me, but what about meeting astrologer Bejan Daruwala? Isn’t it an example of double standards?..."

While Mr. Narendra Modi criticised promptly criticised Nitish Kumar for meeting an occultist, our beloved PM has not bothered to reply the allegation made by Nitish Kumar about Mr. Modi's meeting the astrologer Bejan Daruwala, and the claim made by Mr. Bejan Daruwala, that Mr. Modi showed him (Daruwala) his (Modi's) palm. When was it? What did Daruwala predict? Mr. Nitish Kumar is not an ordinary person among the 1.3 billion Indians. LIke Arvind Kejriwal, Mr. Nitish Kumar may be coming into the dreams of Mr. Narendra Modi.

Here is one interesting website which dealt with the obsessions of Indian Prime Ministers with astrologers and tantriks. It also contains a quote from Nehruji's letter to Indira Gandhi, advising her to get Rajiv Gandhi's horoscope drawn by a capable astrologer. Here is the link and the quote.

Click to go to ibtimes.co.in/veru-superstitious... .

Here is the quote from the above website, about Jawaharlal Nehru's advice to Late Indira Gandhi.

"...Even a hardboiled 'modernist' like the first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, had his moment of weakness. He "hated many of the things which most Hindus hold dear—cow worship, subordinate status for women, temples, sadhus, astrology and caste." But in 'Nehru's Letters to His Sister', edited by Krishna Hutheesing, letter numbered 74, written on 29.8.1944 has Nehru advising his daughter Indira to cast a "proper horoscope" of his grandson (Rajiv) by 'a competent person'!..."

My sincere thanks to Mr. A V Varghese , Senior Journalist at the above website for this important piece of information.

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

Does Shri Ramana Rao know his future? क्या श्री रमणा राव महाशय को अपने भविष्य पता है ? శ్ర్రీ రమణారావు మహాశయులవారికి తమ భవిష్యత్ తెలుసా ?

Going to browsing or Googling, can be compared to Prince (Gautama Buddha) Siddhardha's experience, when he ventured into Streets of Kapilavastu, to know the world. Then he saw some aged person, some sick person, some corpse etc. etc. This story everybody knows.

To continue. सशेष. సశేషం.

414 Why all these top Indian industrialists are standing in queue to meet Mr. Barack Obama? बारक ऒबामा से मिलने के लिये उद्योगपती क्यों क्यू में खडे रहते. బారక్ ఒబామా గారిని కలవటానికి భారతీయ పారిశ్రామిక వేత్తలు ఎందుకు క్యూ కట్తున్నారు.

English: Why all these top Indian industrialists and business persons are in queue to meet Mr. Barack Obama?

Telugu language: bhArat yokka top industrialists andaru america adhyakshuDu bArack ObAma nu kalavaTAniki ikkaDa kyUlo enduku nilabaDDAru?

(Alternatively) t:lEka

E: Why all these top Indian industrialists and business persons have been made to stand in queue to meet Mr. Barack Obama?

t: bhAratIya pAriSrAmika vEttalu mariyu vyApAra vEttalu, Shri bArak obAmA gArini kalavaTAniki queue lO enduku nilabaDETaTlu gA cEya baDDARu?

Are all these people eager to invest in United States of America?

t: vIrantA AmericA lO tama peTTubaDulanu peTTaTAniki uvviLLUrutunnArA?

(Alternatively) t:lEka

E: Are all these greats eager to get bucks from USA for their family run (mismanaged?) businesses whose thirst for funds nobody under this sky can satisfy?

t:  I mahanIyulantA America nunDi bucks nu, tama kuTumbAlu nirvahincE (mismanage cEsE?) vyApArA lOki kuripincu kOvAlani taha taha lADutunnAra?  nidhula kai I top industrialists yokka dAhAdrini I bhU nabha antarALAlO evarU tIrca lEru kada?  SambhuDu mAtramE tIrca galaDEmo!




E: Why Ms. Arundhati BhaTTAcArya, the Chair person of State Bank of India,India's No. 1 Bank, does not appear in this photo?  Didn't the Chairperson of SBI take any interest?  Or has she not been given an opportunity?  Or has she not been forced to join the queue?

T: I citram lO bhArat yokka number 1 Bank, bhAratIya State Bank chair person Ms. ArundhatI bhaTTAcArya kanipinca dEmi?  Ame Asakti kanaparaca lEdA?  lEka Ameku A avakASAnni prasAdinca lEdA?  lEka Amenu balavantamu cEya lEdA? 


E: ybrao-a-Donkey's analyses T: ybrao-gADida viSlEshaNa

E: There is nothing basically wrong in Indian Industrialists and business persons making investments abroad, or seeking investments from abroad.   Considering the viscious and venomous nature of global and Indian investment environment, it will be necessary to X-ray industrial and business psyche!

T: sUtra prAyamgA AlOcistE, bhAraTIya pAriSrAmika vEttalu mariyu vANijya vEttalu vidESAla lO peTTubADulu peTTaDam lEka akkaDa nunDi peTTubaDulanu AhvAninca Tam lO tappEmI lEdu.  kAni prastuta prapanca mariyu bhAratIya anumAna Aspada mariyu visha pUrita peTTubaDula vAtAvaraNAnni gamanistE pAriSrAmika mariyu vANijya psyche ni X ray tIyAlsina avasarAnni koTTi pArEya lEmu.

E:(Incomplete.  Even 1000 pages will not be sufficient to complete this).

T: asampUrNam.  dInni pUrti cEyaAniki vEyi pEjIlu kUDA cAlavu.

Added ybrao a donkey on 25th Sept. 2015. Occasion: Mr. Narendra Modi, INdia's PM's visit to USA

Will all the business magnets and top industrialists of USA will stand in queue to meet Mr. Narendra Modi. Ans: Depends on the AIRCRAFT and weapon purchasing powers of INDIA.

అమెరికా వాణిజ్య వేత్తలంతా, పారిశ్రామిక వేత్తలంతా, నరేంద్ర మోడీ గారిని కలవటానికి భారతీయ వ్యాపారులు, పారిశ్రామికులలాగే క్యూలో నిల్చుంటారా. జవాబు ... అది భారత్ యొక్క విమానాలు మరియు ఆయుధాల కొనుగోలు శక్తి పై ఆధారపడి ఉంటుంది.