1044 (First of ten series) It's great that our Hon. Prime Minister prefers criticism to allegations, shall we be wrong if we try our hand at criticism?

It is enlightening and gratifying to read that our Hon. Prime Minister prefers 'criticism' to 'allegations'. Here is the relevant link to news18.com, dated 20th Jan. 2018: Click here to go to http://www.news18.com/news/politics/there-is-less-criticism-and-more-allegations-on-our-govt-pm-narendra-modi-1637047.html. But my pessimist heart says otherwise. Anyway, if he is a criticism-tolerant Prime Minister, each one of the 1.3 billion adult Indians whom he represents will be delighted to know about it. Of course, Hon. Prime Minister may be replying to International Criticism against his Economic Policies, particularly in Economist.Com. I am not sure whether he will equally appreciate criticisms from his Indian Native Critics, who may differ with him on 'principles and practices' with no malice against him, personally. First, we shall start with some International Criticism against his Economic Policies.

The Economist (Economist.com)

1. Click here to go to https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21723830-he-more-nationalist-firebrand-indias-prime-minister-not-much-reformer. This report is dated 24th June 2007. This report is titled: "India’s prime minister is not as much of a reformer as he seems"... "... But he is more of a nationalist firebrand...". This Report has a cartoon of Hon. Prime Minister, riding on a tiger.

2. The above article, provides link to another article, from the same Economist.com: Click here to go to https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21723815-tax-reform-does-not-go-far-enough-land-and-labour-reforms-have-barely-been-tried-narendra-modi. The title of this Article is: "Narendra Modi is a fine administrator, but not much of a reformer. .." "...Tax reform does not go far enough; land and labour reforms have barely been tried. "

Click here to go to https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21730880-consequences-are-beginning-catch-up-him-indias-prime-minister-focuses-too-much. This report is titled "..India’s prime minister focuses too much on appearances. ..." "...The consequences are beginning to catch up with him... ". This Report has a carton showing Hon. Prime Minister at the mic, with a long oscillating turban.

ybrao-a-donkey's personal views, not intended to be imposed on others

Mr. Narendra Modi is the fifteenth Prime Minister of India, since its independence in 1947. 14th Prime Minister, if we exclude late Gulzarilal Nanda, who was a Stop-Gap Prime Minister when India's First Prime Minister Nehru and its second Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri passed away in 1964 and 1966 respectively. Since his taking over the reins in 2014, Shri Modi, has in the arena of Economy, made some far-reaching changes, especially adverse changes, which 11 of his preceding 14 Prime Ministers could not do, and only the first PM Jawaharlal Nehru, and the 3rd PM Mrs.Indira Gandhi had tried to initiate. We require at least 10,000 pages to make a comparative analyses of the three Prime Ministers. This Comparative Analyses is important because in every one of heads of the nearly 5 million out of 1.3 billion Indians (after deducting children, too-old-to-think-continuously persons, lay persons, illiterates, semi-literates), may be worrying about the Economic Future of this country, whether led by IMF trained / Harvard / Delhi School of Economists or led by charlatans. I mean to say, what will be the Economic Destiny / Destination of this country,

whether steered by Western-trained-Specialists of Finance-Economics-Finance or,

Generalists who believe that they themselves are geniuses or

by some conscious thinkers who have done some diligent studies into the grass-root level problems of the agriculturists, landless laborers, unorganised laborers, poverty-struck masses of this Country.

The chief qualification of a mass leader has become unending infallibility; he can never admit an error.
--A quote of Hannah Arendt

Prima facie Mr. Narendra Modi is also a mass leader, like Late Mrs. Indira Gandhi.

Hence, there will be no wonder, if even after 14 months, Mr. Narendra Modi projects his decision of 'Demonetization' dated 8th Nov. 2016, as a big success.

Reason: What are the Grassroot level facts? Before de-monetization, millions of Indians were saving their hard earned monies in Banks, particularly Public Sector Banks. Today, as Bank have started allowing 'shuttered-down ATMs' to continue in their decay, for days together, and inasmuch as many Public Sector Banks are unable to pay cash to their customers in Banking Halls, as there is a severe Cash shortage, owing to RBI's inability to meet the demand for Cash from Currency Chest Branches of Banks, -- ordinary people (they do not have black money) are under compulsion to keep large stock of cash in their homes to meet unforeseen contingencies arising out of ATM failures and denial of Cash in Bank Branches.

To come back and continue adding / deleting / modifying.

976 Musings on Indian Cricketers, Indian Communism

The above picture shows a banner purportedly on behalf of Bharat Army (Indian Army) thanking Mr. Sachin Tendulkar, an Indian Cricketer Star, for his staying with them for 24 years. It is not clear whether the banner carries the approval from an appropriate authority from Indian Army. It will be for the Indian Army to accept it or to deny it. Occasion: Mr. Sachin Tendulkar was promoting his film in London. In the London City, apart from promoting his film, Mr. Tendulkar also received a Fellowship Award to celebrate "Excellence in Global Asian Community" whatever it may mean. It is also not clear whether the promoters of the Award benefit from the presence of Mr. Tendulkar, or-- Mr. Tendulkar benefits from being conferred the Award, or there will be mutual benefits. Anyway, I do not think, citizens of India will not benefit from their celebrations. During the celebrations, Shri Tendulkar expressed some "His Majestic" intentions, and Expression of Interest. Of course, no MOUs were signed.

RELATED LINKS

Click here to go to http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/sachin-tendulkar-conferred-with-fellowship-award-in-uk/articleshow/58551153.cms, and study the Lofty avowed objectives of Bharat Ratna Sachin Tendulkar.

Let us see what Mr. Tendulkar plans

*...Planning to support charities and various initiatives to help the under-privileged people in the second innings of life. ..."

"...Providing solar lights to poor people in India was one of them. ..."

ybrao-a-donkey's personal views, not intended to be imposed on others

Is Mr. Tendulkar over-privileged, or under-privileged?

Who benefited more? Did the Indian Army benefit by appointing Mr. Tendulkar as its Brand Ambassador? Or did Mr. Tendulkar benefit from his getting appointed as Army's Brand Ambassador?

Mr. Tendulkar is already 44. He is still mooting. He is still thinking of "supporting charities and various initiatives". What are those initiatives? Somebody has to collect funds, buy some goodies such as solar lanterns, arrange functions, he will come late waving his hands, and then distribute the khilone (toys) to those so called under-privileged, amidst Television glares. And that too, if he gets time, after servicing his "Endorsement Marketers" and completing his "short-film shootings". To thank him again for all these, we have to institute a New Award larger than "Bharat Ratna".

Vocabulary help: 'Mute', 'Moot' difference. Both can be used as attributive adjectives. They can also be placed at the end of sentences

MUTE	MOOT
Refraining from speech or temporarily speechless. *(of a person) lacking the faculty of speech. *(of a letter) not pronounced.	*Subject to debate, dispute, or uncertainty. *Having little or no practical relevance. Moot can also be used as verb, noun. Moot, as verb: raise, airing ideas.

Last time we wrote of Respectable Shri D. Raja, the Rajya Sabha Member from Tamil Nadu, was on 30th Nov. 2015. It was in our post No. 619. Click here to go to our post No. 619 and study our criticism of Shri D. Raja.. It was about his getting inspiration from China, and Vietnam as Beacons for Indian Communism.
Today, our subject will be, his interview to DeccanChronicle.com, on 7th May 2017. Click here to go to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/op-ed/070517/sunday-interview-there-needs-to-be-a-movement-to-counter-the-modi-shah-duo.html, and study D. Raja's interview. The title of the interview is "...There needs to be a movement to counter the Modi-Shah duo...". It has mainly dealt with Opposition Unit, for the Election of the President of India, 2017. Two important quotes from the interview are particularly interesting:--

"...I have met Congress president Sonia Gandhi. She is concerned with the current situation. The Sangh Parivar is vitiating the atmosphere. When I told her that there needs to be a broadest possible alliance, she agreed. She also agreed to my view that there needs to be a people’s movement to counter the Modi-Shah duo. ..."

"... All said and done, the Congress is a pan-Indian secular party. The regional parties have their own pulls and pressures. However, no leadership has been discussed as of now. We will talk about it only after the presidential polls. We are not discussing any political alliance as of now. As far as Mr Gandhi is concerned, the Opposition parties have to understand that times are changing. I don’t think blaming Mr Gandhi for everything makes sense. ..."

"...At present, we are interested in a people’s movement. We have to resist the politics of the Sangh Parivar. As of now, this movement should not be linked to electoral politics. ..."

yb-a-donkey's view (not intended to be imposed on others): The history of CPI shows, that the principal reason for its downfall is, its hanging around Congress Party, before the 1962 CPI split, and after the 1962 split.

Is Congress a pan-Indian Party? Is Congress a Secular Party? Is CPI not a pan Indian Secular Party? Only Mr. Raja should explain the Secular character of Congress !!!

During Mrs. Indira Gandhi's days, CPI did not want blame her. Instead, it wanted to hang around her. 2017, CPI does not want to blame Mr. Rahul Gandhi. If Congress is really a pan-Indian Party, and if its Crown Prince Rahul Gandhi is a pan Indian National Leader, then, there should be nothing wrong in blaming Mr. Rahul Gandhi, for his incapability to compete with Mr. Narendra Modi.

About Mr. Raja's idea of People's Movement to counter the Sangh Parivar
1. This falls under one important Communist dilemma/enigma. Which is to be opposed first? Communalism? Or Capitalism? In the name of preventing communalism, Left Parties became soldiers of Congress. In spite of that, finally power went into the hands of Communalists. And the Communalists also seem to be moderating and mending themselves, or at least making facades of shifting themselves,as a balancing act, as they might have found from experience that with only Hindu votes alone, they cannot capture all the States, and at all times.

2. People do not have much time to participate in movements, carry Sickle Flags, get beaten by police lathis, being pushed into police vans, unless some 'wages' are paid for participation, or some alternative money/property benefits are shown. Gone are the days of 'nishkAma karma', English: working without expecting results. Besides, some of the things which CPI and CPIM are promising, are also being offered by BJP, Congress, Regional Paries, who else not?

3. Why CPI and CPM are unable to promise something more drastic?
CPI can promise something like 'Removal of Private Property', 'Nationalisation of all Occupations and Businesses', 'Treating every citizen as a Government Employee', 'Removal of currency system, paper or digital'?

4. When getting defeated in Presidential Elections is 100% predictable, why waste time in selecting some person as a Joint Opposition Candidate? And why should CPI, CPM participate in useless negotiations with the likes of Deve Gowda, Sharad Yadav, Lalu Yadav, Mulayam Yadav? All the resources such as time, money, workers, vehicles, are very precious. Why waste them? They can be spent on communicating to the Workers and the Poorest, instead of hassling and bickering with the likes of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.

To continue adding / deleting / modifying depending on the sentiments of Readers, Governments, Media-s. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

789 (Part 1/ 10) In what way French Presidents live in less vulgar life style when compared to Saddam Hussain and Nicolae Ceausescu?

A trillion Euro question which may creep into a thinking person's mind is, wheher there is any difference among the present French President Mr. Hollande, its Former President Mr. Sarkozi, the slain Iraqi President Mr. Saddam Hussain, and the 1989 Romanian Communist Dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. Context: The news of "Shampoo Socialism" practised by the French President Mr. Francois Hollande, has been NOTICED to have employed with STATE FUNDS, a hair dresser for trimming his hair, @ an annual cost of Pounds 99,000/-. This News Report, originally brought out by a French Satire Magazine on Le Canard Enchaîné, on 13th July 2016, and reported by Telegraph.co.uk is worth reading. Here is the link: Click to go to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/13/hollande-accused-of-shampoo-socialism-as-it-is-revealed-he-spend/ . We should not forget that Mr. Hollande came to power, on a Leftist Socialist Platform, claiming himself to be a normal President, and branding his rival and the Former French President Mr. Sarkozi as "bling bling" President. The allegation against Mr. Sarkozi at that time was, he spent a sum of Pounds 24,000 to stay a night at a Sea-Side resort, with his Companion, a model.

Euro-American Media whenever some instances of ostentatious living of RULERS OF COUNTRIES WHICH THE EURO-AMERICA does not like come out, give great publicity to the news with a "holier than thou" a style of mockery. This blog does not wants to defend such despotic rulers who lived in obscenely ornamented palaces amidst vulgar luxuries, hiding their fuliginous and muddy life-styles. Euro-American thirst to make an overkill of the information is worth noting. While, the same Euro-American Media conveniently ignore the lifestyles of their own leaders. This type of overkill happened in case of the Palace of the Romanian Dictator Nicolae Ceausescu. It happened in the case of Iraqi President Saddam Hussain slain by the American Forces. It happened in the case of the Libyan President Gaddafi, who was overthrown and slain under the directions of USA.

Now, a Bible saying has come true:

Mathew 7: 3 to 5. 3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?

4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye?

5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

Click to go to study the Communist Opulent Living Styles. Romanian Dictator Nicolae Ceausescu had toilet-roll holders made of gold, in his Palace.

Click here to go to http://www.vice.com/read/inside-the-palace-of-a-tyrant-the-opulent-lair-of-nicolae-ceauescu-015.

---

It is not clear how much is paid to the hair-stylists of Indian Presidents and Indian Prime Ministers. The Rashtrapati Bhavan employs an Official Hairstylist for the President. His pay structure, or Remuneration rates are not known. They may need to be searched. One thing is definite. Indian Presidents and Prime Ministers want to live in a style ON PAR WITH THEIR AMERICAN, BRITISH, FRENCH, GERMAN, etc. counterparts. If not at a higher scale, at least on an equivalent scale. Right now, we do not have adequate information.

On googling, I found one web page which contains the personal experiences of President Abdul Kalam's Hairstylist Habib Ahmed. Here is a link for those who wish to study the experiences of with Habib Ahmed: Click to go to http://www.firstpost.com/india/remembering-a-star-customer-abdul-kalam-didnt-like-his-hair-short-says-hairstylist-habib-ahmed-2368358.html . We shall have one quote from his narration:

"... The Ahmeds have had a long association with first families of politics in India. Ahmed’s father Nazir Ahmed was the hair stylist to independent India’s first prime minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and president Rajendra Prasad. Habib Ahmed’s services were requested by late prime minister Indira Gandhi too. "Those were the golden times. We were treated with great respect. We were not labelled according to our profession. After a long gap, I had the great fortune to meet a scientist who became the president and later met him when he finished his tenure. He remained the same warm, caring person that I had known when I first met him. When we met after Dr Kalam finished his tenure, he told me, "Let’s start our relationship again." He meant Ahmed could go back to cutting and styling his hair. "But that day never came again," says Ahmed. ..."

Here is one interesting link, which pertains to the experience of the hairstylist of Mr. Narendra Modi, of 2002, when he was new CM of Gujarat. Click here to go to : http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2002/12/15/stories/2002121501421600.htm. The report was from Rasheeda Bhagat. Title of the Report was SOFT HEARTED POET.

... One interesting story, ascribed to Asian Age, is about Modi's Muslim barber Shabbir Ismail Patel, whose shop was targeted and burnt during the March 2002 communal riots. But the barber waxes eloquent on how his high-profile client helped him get a loan of Rs 50,000 to rebuild the small shop. Says the article, "From a Rajesh Khanna to a Tom Cruise cut, Shabbir has tried it all... on Narendra Modi," right from the '80s, though the hairdresser admits that was in days "when he had more hair"!

ybrao-a-donkey's expression of his humble personal view:

Our Hon. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his youth was said to have approached Ramakrishna Math of Swami Vivekananda heritage, for joining them. When our hero, wanted to be styled as Rajesh Khanna or Tom Cruise, how could he become Swami Vivekananda?

ANOTHER SIMILAR NARRATION

This additional similar narration is available at the following link: Click here to go to: https://www.quora.com/Who-gives-a-haircut-to-Prime-Minister-Narendra-Modi.

ybrao-a-donkey's expression of his humble personal view:

It may not be real use to the poor people of India to know whether Hon. Narendra Modi bore on his head the Rajesh Khanna haircut or the Tom Cruise Haircut, during his reported 20 years stay at Hedgewar Bhavan. According to my mediocre understanding, a person has to work at least part time for his livelihood, whether he has a wife, parents or not. Mr. Modi has left the care of his wife to herself, and the care of her brothers. He has left his mother's care to his brothers. So far so good. Then, what Mr. Modi was doing for his livelihood, to earn to pay for the Rajesh Khanna hairstyles and Tom Cruise hairstyles, for his Modi style kurtas? Like his Guru Swami Vivekananda, was our Narendra Modi also averse to do jobs and earn a livelihood? Was that below his dignity? Social Work, can at the most be "part-time", which is expected to be done after performing the primary duty of earning one's own livelihood through right means.

This my criticism may appear to be somewhat harsh or rude. I do not intend any such harshness or rudeness. This is one basic question which is going to have substantial significance in a truly socialist society. In Capitalist Societies, there is ample place for idle religious preachers and occasional good samaritan service donors, while they do not produce any goods or services for the society most of the time. They come to the fore only during some calamities. Though running schools and hospitals are also undertaken by religious organisations, they are all fronts for a show. This basic question must receive its importance: Why not every citizen of India (except sick and aged persons who are physically challenged) produce some TANGIBLE goods and services and earn his daily food? Why not they undertake regular work, which should be a mix of both physical and mental labor? Why should they hide their idleness behind service organisations?

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

665 You are my paternal aunt. How can I do this to you?

In my mother tongue, Telugu language, there is a proverb "sagam peTTi mEnatta anTE ela?". Its approx. English gist is based on a small anecdote: Once a nephew and a paternal aunt (father's sister) had a love affair, with a sexual intercourse. In most Regional sub-cultures of India, sex with paternal aunt is a moral taboo, and a sort of incest, though may not be absolute legal incest. This nephew, after half-penetration, suddenly got a moral dilemma and said "You are my mEnatta (paternal aunt). How can I do this to you?". He wanted to withdraw. This proverb, though somewhat obscene and un-parliamentary, has an important message, "Either we should have things in full, or not have them at all'.

What Late Jawaharlal Nehru, the First Prime Minister of India, and Late Indira Gandhi, the Second Prime Minister of India with Socialist Pretentions, did to India was the same thing. Though Late Jawaharlal Nehru pronounced that PUblic Sector in India will reach Commanding Heights, he did not do enough to introduce True Socialism in India. Either it may be his half-heartedness, or it may be teething problems which nascent independent India faced, or headaches like Jammu Kashmir, Goa, Pondicherry, or it may be non-cooperation from his Finance Ministers such as Morarji Desai, and T.T. Krishnamachary. Late Chakravartula Rajagopalachary (Rajaji) too might have resisted it.

As far as I can recollect, it was Mrs. Indira Gandhi, who got the word "Socialist" inserted into the Indian Preamble of the INdian Constitution. Though she has taken some courageous steps like Nationalisation of Banks, Insurance Companies and Nationalisation of Petroleum Companies, she did not go beyond populism. Total Removal of Private Property, Abolition of Stock Exchanges, Abolition of Currency System, Abolition of Private Trade and Industry, also ought to have been tried. It may be too much for us to expect that she would abolish Family System to emancipate Women from Family work, Abolition of Family System. She herself visited Babas to get blessings.

Whatever half-half things were done with various motives, gradually, P.V. Narasimha Rao and Mr. Manmohan Singh tried to UNDO, and take credit for it.

For this reason only, the above reference to the Telugu Proverb "sagam peTTi mEnatta" has become apt. Now, Readers will see! Mr. Bernie Sanders (Democratic Contender for the American Presidency), Mr. Jeremy Corbyn (England's Labor Party Leader), Mr. Alexis Tsipras (Prime Minister of Greece), all fall in this "sagam peTTi mEnatta" category.

Mr. Barack Obama eight years back raised GREAT EXPECTATIONS worldwide. What happened? Now, eight years elapsed. The US is at the same place, where it was eight years back.

The US will be at the same place in 2020, where it is in 2016, whether Mr. Bernie Sanders will win the Election or not. Even if Donald Trump wins the Elections, still US will be at the same place. Reason: They are just two cogs in a big machine. If they try too hard, they will be caught in some pinion wheel. Though they may not be assassinated physically, they will be made mentally imbecile. Besides, most Americans at least, as on date, do not appear to believe in the efficacy of True Socialism as a cure for all the viruses of Capitalism. Yet, they may elect Mr. Bernie Sanders, with a "small-boundary-limit" that he will not exceed their brief and will not go too far. They too want "sagam peTTi mEnatta".



Yet to be written. I shall write tomorrow.

To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.

604 There should be no discrimination between Sardar Patel & Indira Gandhi सर्दार पटेल और इंदिरा गांधी के मध्य विचक्षण नहीं दिखाना సర్దార్ పటేల్ మరియు ఇందిరా గాంధీల మధ్య విచక్షణ చూపకూడదు

Today is Late Ms. Indira Gandhi's Birth day.

आज स्वर्गीय इंदिरा गांधी की जन्म दिन.

ఈ రోజు స్వర్గీయ ఇందిరా గాంధీ యొక్క జన్మ దినం.

Many of us Indians have poor memory, and poorer memory of history.

हम भारतीयों को स्मरण शक्ती कम है, और इतिहासिक विषयों में स्मरण शक्ती बहुत बहुत कम है।

మన ** భారతీయులకు స్మరణ శక్తి తక్కువ, చారిత్రిక విషయాలయందు ఇంకా తక్కువ.**

When the Congress Governments rule India, they highlight all the birth and death anniversaries of the members of Nehru Dynasty, by releasing full page ads., organising prayers at tombs of the departed souls (in case of Ms. Indira Gandhi, it is "Shakti Sthal".

जब कांग्रॆस् सरकारों के जमाने चलते, वे नॆह्रू वंश जनों के जन्म और मृत्यु दिवसों को धूम धाम से मानते, अखबारों मे पूर्ण पृष्ठ विज्ञापन प्रभूत्व खर्च पर छपाते हे, समाधियों के सामने प्रार्धना समारोह निर्वहण करते (इंदिरा गांधी की विषय में यह है, "शक्ति स्थल")

కాంగ్రెస్ ప్రభుత్వాలు అధికారంలో ఉన్నప్పుడు , నెహ్రూ కుటుంబ సభ్యులందరి జన్మ దినాలు, వర్ధంతులు, బాగా ప్రచారం ఇచ్చి పత్రికలలో పూర్తి పేజీ ప్రకటనలను వదిలి, నేతల సమాధుల వద్ద ప్రార్ధనా సమావేశాలను ఏర్పాటు చేయటం (ఇందిరా గాంధీ విషయంలో స్మారక స్థలం పేరు **శక్తి స్థల్ **).

As anticipated and foreseen, the BJP Government has not released any commemorative advertisement about the Birth Day of Indira Gandhi. They also did the same thing on the Death Anniversary of Ms. Indira Gandhi on 31st Oct. 2015.

यथा प्रत्याशित, केंद्र में सत्ता शाली बीजेपी सरकार, इंदिरा गांधी जन्म दिवस को , संस्मरण करने के लिये , कुछ विज्ञापन भी नहीं छपाया। सुश्री इंदिराजी की वर्धंंति दिवस (दिनांक ३१ अक्टोबर विषय में भी यह ही हुआ।

ఊహించినట్లుగానే, కేంద్రంలో అధికారంలో ఉన్న బీజేపీ ప్రభుత్వం వారు, శ్రీమతి ఇందిరాగాంధీ జన్మ దినాన్ని సంస్మరించుకోటానికి ప్రకటనను విడుదల చేయలేదు. స్వర్గీయ ఇందిర వర్ధంతి, 31 October 2015 నాడు కూడ ఇదే జరిగింది.

It is good that the BJP Government loves Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel.

यह तो संतोष कारक है कि बिजेपी सरकार सर्दार वल्लभ भाय पटेल को प्रेम और मान करती है।

బీజేపీ ప్రభుత్వం వారు సర్దార్ పటేల్ గారిని ప్రేమించటం, గౌరవించటం ఆనందించ తగినదే.

If the Govt. wants to control costs, cutting on the advertisement expenses, BJP's move will be welcome. But it must apply to all leaders equally. There should be no discrimination between Sardar Patel and Mrs. Gandhi.

अगर सरकार खर्चों को करना चाहती है, विज्ञापन खर्चों को काटना चाहती है, बीजेपी सर्कार की चर्या को हम समर्धनीय मान सकते हैँ। लेकिन, यह खर्च कटाव सभी नेताओं को ,** विचक्षणा रहित** रूप मे होना चाहिए।

ప్రభుత్వం వారు ఖర్చులు తగ్గించుకోటానికి, ప్రకటనల ఖర్చులలో కోతపెట్టటం వాంఛనీయమే. కానీ ఖర్చుల కోత అనేది అందరు నేతలకు సమంగా, విచక్షణా రహితంగా జరగాలి. అధికార పార్టీ ప్రేమించే పటేల్ గారికి ఒక సూత్రం, అధికార పార్టీ ద్వేషించే ఇందిరా గాంధీకి ఒక సూత్రాన్ని వర్తింప చేయకూడదు.

There is a thousand kilometers distances between the personalities , administrative methods of Late Sardar Patel and Late Ms. Indira Gandhi. Without any hesitation, we can say, that India's downfall started with the coronation of Ms. Indira Gandhi as India's Prime Minister, after the demise of Late Lal Bahadur Sastry.

सर्दार पटेल के व्यक्तित्व और परिपालना पध्धति और इंदिरा गांधी की व्यक्तित्व और परिपालाना पध्धतियों में हस्ति मशकांतर है। निस्संदेह, हम यह कह सकते हैं कि, भारत के पतनावस्था, श्रीमति इंदिरा गांधी को , लाल बहदूर शास्त्री के मरणानंतर, भारत प्रधान मंत्री रुप में प्रतिष्ठापन किया हुआ दिन से ही शुरू हूआ। कम से हम इस ऐतिहासिक कारण से, हम श्रीमती गांधी की जयंती और वर्धंतियों को याद करना समुचित होगा।

సర్దార్ పటేల్ వ్యక్తిత్వం, పాలన పధ్ధతులు, మరియు శ్రీమతి ఇందిరా గాంధీ వ్యక్తిత్వం, పాలనా పధ్ధతుల మధ్య వేయి కిలోమీటర్ల వ్యత్యాసం ఉంది. ** నిస్సందేహంగా మనం చెప్పచ్చు, ఇందిరాగాంధీ గారిని, శ్రీ లాల్ బహదూర్ శాస్త్రిగారి మరణానంతరం, భారత ప్రధానమంత్రిగా పట్టాభిషేకం చేసిన రోజునే, భారత్ కు పతనావస్థ ప్రారంభం అయిందని.**

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది. ఇంకో రోజు.