

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS TEST No.
Today's Bar chart
THOUSANDS OF SQUARE KM.
Though this blog has been started as 'problems of telugus', we have expanded into National problems of India, and the problems of the World, particularly Poverty, Inequalities of Income and Wealth. I support Atheism and Marxism which I call TOTAL TRUE SOCIALISM, but I do not wish to impose on others. If you do not like what I write, pl. write your comment here. If you like anything, pl. tell others.
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T |
U | V | W | X | Y | Z | -- | -- | -- | -- |
The AIMPLB said qazis and imams will inform the wife that she can exclude the husband’s right to give instant triple talaq.
The affidavit said social boycott will help decrease the incidents of divorce.
"...AIMPLB is a private body working to protect Muslim personal laws, liaise with and influence the Government of India and guide the general public about crucial issues. The board has a working committee of 51 ulama representing various schools of thought. In addition to this, it also has a general body of 201 persons of ulama as well as laymen, including about 25 women. ..."
"... However, some of the Shias and Muslim feminists have formed their own separate boards, the All India Shia Personal Law Board and the All India Muslim Women's Personal Law Board, respectively but have failed to win any significant support from the Muslims or the government. ..."
"... The diktats and rules of All India Muslim Personal Law Board does not apply to Shia and Ahmadiyya Muslims in India. Ahmadis were not allowed to sit on the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, which is widely regarded in India as representative of Muslims in the country as most Muslims don't consider the Ahmadis as Muslims.
"...The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is a non-government organisation constituted in 1973 to adopt suitable strategies for the protection and continued applicability of Muslim Personal Law in India, most importantly, the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, providing for the application of the Islamic Law Code of Shariat to Muslims in India in personal affairs. Some Muslims followed Hindu customs before 1937. The Act applies to all matters of personal law except such successions. ..."
sub judice/sʌb ˈdʒuːdɪsi,sʊb ˈjuːdɪkeɪ/ adjective : under judicial consideration and therefore prohibited from public discussion elsewhere.
boycott/ˈbɔɪkɒt/ verb : withdraw from commercial or social relations with (a country, organization, or person) as a punishment or protest. noun: a punitive ban on relations with other bodies, cooperation with a policy, or the handling of goods.
Source: net.
botch/bɒtʃ/ noun: a bungled task. Verb. 1. botch up - make a mess of, destroy or ruin; "I botched the dinner and we had to eat out"; "the pianist screwed up the difficult passage in the second movement"
Source: www.thefreedictionary.com/botch+up
cleavage/ˈkliːvɪdʒ/ noun: a sharp division; a split. The hollow between a woman's breasts when supported, especially as exposed by a low-cut garment.
Undaunted: 1. undismayed; not discouraged; not forced to abandon purpose or effort: undaunted by failure. 2. undiminished in courage or valor; not giving way to fear; intrepid: Although outnumbered, he was undaunted.
grievous/ˈɡriːvəs/ adjective: (of something bad) very severe or serious.
"...Take cities such as Gurgaon and Chandigarh. The former has grown around highways. Most hotels, bars and restaurants are concentrated along these highways and pull in young professionals and foreign tourists. Following the Supreme Court order, at least 200 liquor licences in Gurgaon – including 150 bars and 15 high-end hotels – have been rendered ineffective. Similarly, in a small city like Chandigarh the apex court directive has forced at least 91 bars, pubs and restaurants to go dry.
Needless to say such closures will lead to enormous losses to business and tourism, which will translate into jobs lost as well as huge revenue losses for state governments which could have been spent on people’s welfare. The uncertainty of India’s business climate will deter investment from coming to India. And given the number of livelihoods at stake it’s more than likely that illegal liquor vends will proliferate along highways, leading to bigger risks to public safety. Even the man whose PIL led to the highway liquor ban – Chandigarh-based activist Harman Sidhu – has said he never wanted popular watering holes within city limits to shut down.
As always, measures to ramp up governance will work far better than radical decrees. Policing should improve on highways to tackle drunken driving. State governments should be directed to allocate more resources for this purpose. Only constant checking of drivers and punishment for offenders can deter those who drink and drive. Blanket bans and prohibition-like decrees, whether from judiciary or legislature, only make the problem worse. In this case they will injure the economy and cripple the tourism industry – which happens to be the sector that produces the most jobs per rupee invested. The apex court must reconsider its decision.
"... The Indian Express spoke to two judges who were members of the collegium when Justice Naidu, who is also related to Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu through marriage, was elevated from the Bar to the Bench. They confirmed that it had been decided while appointing him that, in the interest of justice, he would be transferred out of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Among the reasons given for this decision was the fact that he had professional links with Justice Chelameswar’s son and his relationship with Chief Minister Naidu. ...".
FISCAL POLICY: Deals with A Government's income and Expenditure. Example: budget, tax revenues, internal borrowings, external borrowings, plan expenditure, non-plan-expenditure, deficit financing etc. Primarily, a domain of Ministry of Finance.
MONETARY POLICY: Deals with Money Supply in the Economy. Internal Currency Management. Pricing of moneys (interest rates). etc. Primarily, a domain of Reserve Bank of India, though technically RBI itself is an instrument of the Government.
There used to be a king. He had seven sons. The seven sons went, hunted, and brought seven fish. They dried them. One fish did not dry. The owner-prince of that particular fish, went to it and questioned: "Oh fish! Oh fish! Why did not you get dry?"
Fish: "A haystack obstructed my access from sunlight."
Prince: (The Prince went to the haystack, and asked it): "Oh haystack! Oh haystack! Why did you obstruct sunlight to the fish?"
Haystack:- "Cow did not graze me".
(Now the Prince went to the cow and asked it). "Oh cow! Oh cow! Why didn't you graze the hay?"
Cow: "The cowherd didn't take me to grazing".
(Now, the Prince went to the cowherd and asked him): "Ow Cowherd! Oh Cowherd! Why didn't you make the cow to graze?"
Cowherd: "Mother did not feed me my breakfast! "
(Now, the Prince went to Mother and asked her): "Oh Mother ! Oh Mother ! Why didn't you provide breakfast to the cowherd?"
Mother: "The child wept. Hence I could not attend to the cowherd's needs."
(Now, the Prince went to the child and asked it): "Oh child! Oh child! Why did you weep?"
Child: "Ant bit me".
(Now, the Prince went to the ant, and asked it): "Oh ant ! Oh ant! Why did you bite the child?"
Ant: "If the child keeps its finger, in my golden ant-hole, won't I bite him? What should I do, if not biting it? "
The Bank Officials question the late depositor: "Why didn't you deposit old notes earlier?"
Late depositor: "Long queues obstructed me going into the ATM room. Police guards and long queues at Bank gates, obstructed me from entering Banking Halls."
Now the Bank Officials have to go to long queues and ask the queue-gens: "Why did you obstruct the late depositor from going in /coming in?". But with their workload, the Bank Staff are getting heart attacks. They are unable to perform their daily or alternate day sexual intercourse with their wives, as Bank-staff are spending 24/7 in Banks, and are getting too fatigued to perform sex.
"...The question is: did the PM have a right to do this? Does the government have the right to deny ordinary people access to their own money? To suddenly make their money vanish? Without access to money, one cannot access food, medical care, transport and other essentials. Doesn’t this impinge on our fundamental right to life and liberty? ..."
"...After five days of utter chaos, in which the elderly died of heart attacks and stress standing in snaking queues for their own hard-earned cash, and parents saw their children die as hospitals refused their cash, the PM returned to address us on the matter. Give me 50 days, he said in a dramatic speech, choking up as he talked about himself: “Even if you burn Modi alive, Modi is not scared.” . Who is he talking to? Who could possibly burn him alive? He, with his multi-layered security? Why does our PM, the lawfully-elected head of a respectable democracy, go on as if there was no rule of law in his own country? “Hang me in public!” he had said earlier, inviting us to the barbaric act if we could prove his involvement in the 2002 Gujarat riots. ..."
"...Women who scrimp and save from household expenses and secretly squirrel away some money for their children or the future. These are people who can’t go to the bank and exchange their notes. And they have been hit the hardest. Does Mr Modi have the right to make their legitimate money vanish? In his speech, he seemed thrilled about it. He even wiggled his thumbs to mock the family that had a wedding coming up and no money at home. Does Mr Modi know the country he is ruling? How can he take away the fundamental right to life and liberty of Indian citizens? ..."
"...What is clear, however, is that our basic rights and dignity guaranteed by the Constitution can suddenly vanish like the Rs 500 note. Unless we raise the most obvious questions. Since raising questions is now deemed to be unpatriotic in public discourse, let’s raise them at least in Parliament. ..."
"...NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court warned on Friday that people standing in long queues for hours every day for scarce cash could turn riotous, as it asked the Centre to take urgent measures to end their ordeal. "It is a serious issue. This affects the entire population. You (the government) cannot deny there is a serious problem. There could be riots," a bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice AR Dave said, drawing a sharp retort from attorney general Mukul Rohatgi. ..." To read this report in full, click this link: Click to go to TimesofIndia.IndiaTimes.com.
"...I’m a professional soldier! I fight when I have to and am very glad to get out of it when I haven’t to. You’re only an amateur: you think fighting’s an amusement. Captain Bluntschli, Act III pg. 63 ..."
After being challenged to a duel, Captain Bluntschli brusquely explains the difference between his own professional attitude and Sergius’ romantic attitude towards fighting. In proposing a duel Sergius believes he can win or demonstrate honor. Bluntschli approaches the duel from a practical standpoint, calculating how best to keep both participants unharmed. Fighting holds no romance for the captain; it is a business and a brutal one at that. Though Sergius interprets his reluctance as a sign of moral weakness, Bluntschli is not cowardly, unwilling or unable to fight. He only knows the destruction fighting can cause all too well. On the other hand, Sergius has faced far fewer battles and fights and is still largely ignorant of the meaning and consequences of violence.
"If you make a mistake, own it and move quickly to fix it.”
--Tooey Courtemanche.
![]()
Ravana playing his vINA a stringed classical musical instrument of India. Late Senior NTR in the Telugu film Sitarama Kalyanam.
Book 3, Chapter 64, Verse 46 and 47 3-64-46 3-64-47Kaanchana urah chaDAh ca imE
कांचन उरः चडाः इमे
piSAca vadanAha kharaaha
पिशाच वदना- खराः
bhIma rUpA mahA kAyAha
भीम रूपाः महा कायाः
kasya vA nihatA raNE.
कस्य वा निहता रणे।
Context & English gist: Ravana abducted Sita in his Pushpak Aircraft, when Sita, Rama, and Lakshmana were in the 14th year of their Exile to Forest. A kite named JaTAyu stopped Ravana's aircraft and fought with him. Ravana slew JaTAyu, and took away Sita. In that battle, the donkeys dragging the Ravana's aircraft were killed.This verse describes the donkeys which were killed by JaTAyu: kAncana uraha= they have golden necklaces. chadAh= chestplates made of gold piSAca vadanaha= they have ghastly faces.
Valmiki Ramayana. Sanskrit Language.
Book 3 Book of Forest- Aranya Kanda. Chapter 64, Sarga 64. Verse 14, SlOka 14.
mandAkinIm janasthAnam
imam prasravaNam girim
sarvANi anucariSyAmi
yadi siitaa hi labhyate |
Context in Valmiki Ramayana, & English gist: Ravana abducted Sita. Rama and Lakshmana were searching for Sita. They came down to banks of River Godavari. Rama was speaking to Lakshmana.
We shall search this entire Mandakini River of Janasthana (Literal Meaning : place of People. Contextal Meaning: Neutral forest area not belonging to any Empire, or the Empire of Demons i.e. Ravana), these hills full of rapids and caves, if Sita could be found.
It is very clear that Mandakini of Chitrakoot is the River at the bank of which Panchavati was located and Sita was abducted by Ravana. This Mandakini-Chitrakoot can be reached by Ravana from Ravangaon-Vidisha, by a chariot driven by mules.
Whenever Rama was calling 'Godavari River', we may have to take it as 'Gupt Godavari' (some part underground) of Mandakini-Chitrakoot, and not as Nasik-Godavari or Bhadrachalam-Godavari.