858 So little a contribution from a Member of Parliament, from an Enlightened Constituency like Guntur!

Admirers and adorers of our Members of Parliament may frown, when I say "So little, when compared to so much remuneration and so many perquisites". But yet, facts and truths can be stranger than fiction. In the early days of Independent India between 1947 and 1960, Parliament Members might have received petty amounts as their remuneration and perquisites. But in 2016, things are different. Formal ostensible Salaries & Allowances payable to Indian MPs are determined by THE SALARY, ALLOWANCES AND PENSION OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ACT, 1954 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER. A link to see these details: Click to go to and download details of Salary & Allowances of MPs. These salaries and allowances, prima facie, may appear to be a pittance when compared to salaries and allowances drawn by Top and Upper-Middle Private Sector CEOs, CFOs, COOs, and other executives. Three things, we have to keep in mind: 1. Though salaries may appear low, perquisites and facilities provided to MPs are Princely and Regal. 2. Most of them are tax-free. 3. The work done by the MPs to benefit the Nation, or their State, or their Constituencies, or at least to the persons of their caste/religion / their occupational class, pales into insignificance when compared to the amounts spent by Government on their maintenance.

A few questions asked in Parliament, and posting them on Face Book alone cannot justify their performances. An enlightened Clerk or an Accountant can do all these things.


A Parliament Member may have a thousand attenders, clerks, assistants, coteries, employees, hangers-around, servants, workers, to look after his work. Yet, MPs or other human hoi polloi have only two hands, two hands, two legs, one spine, one brain, one mind, one intellect, one parietal cortex in the single brain. That means, whether MPs or other ordinary homosapiens can control/discharge/handle only a few functions at a time. Unlike in eating, there cannot be voracious grabs in performing duties/functions. Right from Prime Minister, Finance Minister, to the Local Municipal Chair persons, strangely want to manage Sports bodies/Organisations in India. Last time, we dealt with this subject, in our blog-post No. 465, Click to go to 465..

Link to the facebook page of Mr. Galla Jayadev, MP from Guntur: Click here to go to the FaceBook page of Shri Galla Jayadev.. As on date, it has about 180,000 likes.

Suggestion: It will be better to have separate web sites / facebook pages, for a role as PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVE, and for Amar Raja Batteries etc. Businesses + promoting son as film star etc. This may be necessary because maintenance of FaceBook pages also requires employment of resources. Using allowances/perquisites received as MP may have to be separately accounted for, from the personal, family, Corporate P.R. (Public Relations). Of course, there may be some MPs who may be spending their monies on public causes, while a large number of MPs use public resources for private purposes. Every person cannot become a MokshagunDam Visvesvaraiah, the Great Engineer from Karnataka, who used to maintain separate inks and pens, for official purposes, and private purposes.



Both in world politics and Indian politics, like/as in Java language, we have "inheritance". In the FaceBook page of Shri Jayadev, Readers can also find photos of his son Shri Galla Ashok Babu, who is being promoted as a film star (one rung in the ladder, with ultimate last rung to political chairs), by his father Shri Jayadev and uncle Shri Mahesh Babu, a Film Star in good demand in Tollywood (Telugu filmland). Well, as long as we like to live in Capitalism, these things do happen, and we can really find fault with. There are only two choices, probably. Either accept Capitalism in toto with all its merits and warts, or opt for Complete True Socialism, which has not so far been correctly or fully tested.

Even in dictatorial dynastic hypocratic Communist Countries like Cuba and North Korea these things happen. In 2016 USA, Ms. Hillary Clinton tried to use this type of launch pads, but SHE COULD NOT SUCCEED, not because American People are 'merit and sincerity loving, or otherwise', but because they found that 'employment of locals', 'PREVENTING THE INDIANS AND MEXICANS FROM ENTERING USA' as more important than vague promises. ‎

.
It is not clear how Mr. Nara ChandraBabu Naidu, Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh settled/solved the complaint received by him from a woman by name Ms. Guntupalli Padmaja, who alleged that Mr. Galla Jayadev tried to acquire her house, a prime property in Guntur, by influencing the Officials of Andhra Bank to sell it in an auction. This news appeared in Deccan Chronicle of approx. 23rd July 2016. We too touched upon this topic in our blog-post No. 792 Click to go to post No. 792.. This news can also be seen at Click to go to http://www.indiontv.in/news.php?title=woman-complains-to-naidu-against-tdp-mp-galla-jayadev

CHIEF MINISTER HAS TO SPEAK OUT TRANSPARENTLY

Our Chief Minister speaks to Media about so many things, everyday. It is not clear whether Mr. Naidu has already counselled both the parties appropriately, or whether he has spoken to the MP anything relevant to the problem. This is specially important because A.P. Capital Region, Temporary Secretariat Velagapudi also falls in the area of Guntur Parliamentary Constituency. The State Headquarters of Telugu Desam Party is also in Guntur. If Mr. Chandra Babu Naidu has advised both the parties to settle the matter in Civil Courts, the same-thing, he can make clear publicly. The MP, Chief Minister, TDP President, TDP All India General Secretary, Polit Bureau, ought not depend on only FORGETFULNESS of public memory. Just as Caesar's wife must be above suspicion, our Lok Sabha members should also be above suspicion. OUR LOK SABHA MPs REPRESENT 1/542 OF OUR NATION, AND NATIONAL ASPIRATIONS. They cannot be ordinary guys with ordinary wants. After all, Shri Jayadev is one of the richest MPs in Andhra Pradesh, and in India. Then, why should he have such a too small a desire to buy a paltry (by his level and standards) house of about Rs. 80 million, through technically-legal, but not ethically-so-clean methods?

APOLOGIES TO SHRI GALLA JAYADEV. THIS IS NOT INTENDED AGAINST HIM PERSONALLY.

My apologies to Shri Galla Jayadev. He is not the only Member of Parliament, whose contributions tend to be lower than remunerations paid and free/concessional perquisites provided. MPs under performing is a common feature in Indian Democracy. Historically also, since 1927, when Chittaranjan Das- Motilal Nehru led Swarajya Party and others decided to participate in Indian Elections, the under-performance of People's Representatives, is continuing. But at that time, remunerations and perquisites were of low value. There was a view that MPs were serving gratis (free, a sort of charity, philonthropic service). But now, the Remuneration and Perquisites are raising in tune with inflation and demands of MPs.

This under-performance of Members of Parliament has been ubiquitous, irrespective of parties they represent. I can't say about Late S.V.L. Narasimham. But, the underperformance was there, during the days of Late Kotta Raghu Ramaiah (Former Union Minister), Late NG Ranga ( a pioneer of farmers' movement in India, freedom fighter), S.M. Lal John Basha, Shri Y.V. Rao, Shri Rayapati Sambasiva Rao ( a tobacco, cotton industrialist & trader).

REASON FOR PAYMENT OF MODEST HONORARIUM(A) INSTEAD OF HIGH SALARIES ON PAR WITH BUSINESS EXECUTIVES

Unlike other public servants in India such as IAS, IPS, IRS, IFS, Forest Service Officers, other Gazetted and Non-Gazetted Officers in Central and State Governments who are regarded as full-time slaves (in spite of some cadres having specified working hours), and forbidden from pursuing part-time occupations and avocations, businesses, Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) and Members of Parliament have been permitted to continue their occupations and businesses, and maintain themselves without depending on, and expecting Government Salaries. In other words, MLAs, MPs, and Ministers have been regarded as part-timers, serving the Nation, even if not gratis, at least at concessional rates.

Question: Then, how do you justify, huge amounts paid as allowances, towards perquisites, showing them as reimbursments?

The additional amounts paid / given as freebies to MLAs and MPs, are regarded as OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES. These expenses, are intended to be duly incurred, in discharge of the sacred duties which MLAs and MPs perform, while serving the Nation. For example, MLAs and MPs are paid allowances for maintaining their offices in Delhi, State Capitals, and in their respective Constituencies. Stenographers, Clerks-Assistants, Managers, Computer-Operators, Telephone Operators, attenders, receptionists, are expected to be appointed and maintained by MLAs, and MPs, so as they to be available to public at all times. Besides, they have to conduct surveys in the Constituencies, collect data, process them, identify problems, take up with appropriate Public Authorities for redressal of grievances. It is not happening, in respect of many MLAs and MPs.

Question: MLAs and MPs belong to LEGISLATIVE WING OF OUR CONSTITUTION. They have to discharge only Legislative Functions. They do not consider themselves as Executives, or Judges. In India, we have a system of Strict Separation of Powers. MLAs and MPs should not intrude into Executive and Judicial Duties.

Ans: True. But people's voters' expectations have changed. Besides, at the time of canvassing in elections, candidates are not clearly telling people/voters about the restrictive role, they have been assigned to play by the Indian Constitution. Besides, if the candidates tell the truth, that they are supposed to perform only the LEGISLATIVE PART, then, voters will dump them into dust bin.

Question: You seem to be exaggerating the issue disproportionately? Why all this fuss?

Ans: In 2014 May, some people might have thought that Congress would never resurrect itself. Mr. Narendra Modi has also emphasized about his accomplishing 'Congress-mukt bharat' (India Liberated from Congress). At that time, it appeared to be progressing. But after the 2016 Demonetization fiasco, Mr. Rahul Gandhi seems to be resurrecting himself, and trying to bring himself up by 2019 as next PM. If that happens, it may be a National Disaster for India. Unfortunately, many Regional leaders like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Mayavati, Mamata Banerjee, Aravind Kejriwal (et al) , though they may have Prime Ministerial ambitions, cannot fill the gap. We (not yb-donkey. It is Indian voters for Lok Sabha) have to search for new set of National Leaders by 2019. Both Indian voters and the Indian Lok Sabha candidates need intellectual upgradation. Voters have to raise themselves intellectually, if they are to select right type of candidates for Lok Sabha. For that, voters have to examine numerous questions.

Example: Whether we need our MPs as full-timers or part-timers? A full-time MP should not, as long as he-she is MP , engage himself in businesses directly or indirectly. Suppose, if we choose a full-timer, what should be his credentials?

In case of full-time MPs, as their wages-perquisites are paid on full-time basis, voters get a right to monitor the performance of MPs- about how they are spending their time. Are the MPs spending their time working as brokers for industrialists, to get their (industrialists, business-persons, Corporates) work done in New Delhi? If MPs purchase lands, properties, are they trying to get projects from Centre and State which will benefit them financially. Are they manipulating insider information about new projects coming in the area, to promote their own personal /corporate business interests? People cannot have MPs as brokers, - or brokers as MPs.

Another crucial question also may arise. While there can be a full time MP/MLA with full-time wages, can there be a full-time worker of a political party? If so who will pay his wage? It cannot be termed honorarium.

To continue. सशेष. సశేషం. ఇంకా ఉంది.

603 My name is OZYMANDIAS, King of Kings.मेरा नाम ऒजिमांडियास, राजाओं के राजा हूँ। నా పేరు ఒజమాండియాస్, రాజులకి రాజుని.

WE DO NOT KNOW that Telugu People will be too ready and willing to be ****ed @ Rs. 250 million per film. हमें पता नहीं है कि, तॆलुगु जनता को, एक फिल्म के लिये रु. २५ करोड हिसाब पर मार सकते। మాకు తెలియదండి, తెలుగు ప్రజలను ఒక్కో సినిమాకు రూ. 25 కోట్ల లెక్కన విషయించ వచ్చని.
Else we would have made some billions. Now what is the use !!! We are all gone !!! पता है तो, हम बिलियन्स बना सकते थे। अभी क्या फाइदा है। हम सब गया हूआ है। తెలిసి ఉంటే మేము బిలియన్లు పిండుకొని ఉండేవాళ్ళము. లక్షలతో తృప్తి పడాల్సి వచ్చింది. ఇపుడు చింతించి ఏమి లాభం. మేమంతా ధూళిలో కలిసితిమి కదా!!!

After the fall of Maratha and Mughal empires, i.e. the 1st half of the 18th Century, robbers named PinDAris and Thugs, raided villages, riding horseback, killing people recklessly, abducting women, and snatching away gold. According to some historians, these Thugs and PinDAries were the soldiers who lost their employment, but had guns in their hands and horses under their seats. Though some British Governor Generals took credit for eliminating the Thugs and PinDAris, fact remains that their incarnations continue even now in Chambal Valley, UP, and Bihar.

Down the South India, we do not have the Thugs and PinDArIs in the rugged rustic form of horse-riding gun-wielders, but in the form of film stars. We need not name them, saying them Razni Kanth, Mahesh Babu, Pavan Kalyan, Chiranjivi, Amitabh Bachan, Salman Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, Amir Khan,Ranveer Singh, Ranbir Kapoor, so on and so forth. Calling the so called mega stars as Thugs and PinDAris will be an insult to the Thugs and PinDAris.

How can we solve this problem in Total Socialism, your fad?

Total Socialism without "Awareness among People" does not really materialise. Even if somebody tries to force it upon people (Lenin tried his Brand of Communism, but it is not clear whether Soviet Communism deteriorated during his lifetime , or during the decades following his demise, upto 1991), such coercions will neither benefit people nor last long.

There is also a dire and imperative need for a visualisation and discussion of how things are to be during Total Socialism, before pursuing it as a fantasy or as a goal. It is, therefore, a good question, to examine how the problem of Mega Stars, Mega Cricketers, Mega Sports-persons including Tennis Players, Footballers, and thousand other celebrity classes pillaging the poor Indians, and the World-- can be set right in the new set up.

We must also keep in mind, the malfunctioning of State monopolies in Entertainment and Information Sectors. Still, when compared to what is happening in the name of Films, Sports, Entertainment (&c.), it will be better even to have a very little, as long as it is qualitative. But, then again, there arises a problem of defining what constitutes 'quality'.

What I am concerned, is, about persons performing labor worth $10,000 per annum, and taking away $10 million as remuneration. This cannot be allowed under the pretext that people develop a craze towards some Xyz calling them Mega stars or a Super Heros and that Market is paying them, why should we object. If "Market Paying huge amounts on its own volition" is correct, then there should be no need to corner theaters, and jack up prices, threaten small producers, and black market the tickets during the first week. Though there may be nothing wrong in calling the Protagonists in films-- Mega Stars and Super Stars, there will definitely be great danger in allowing them to knock away, the whole cake of Revenues from films. The proletariat of the Film Industry (i.e. Junior Artists, Technicians, part-timers and others including Cinema Theater Gate-keepers) should have protested and revolted against this abominable State of Affairs in the Film Industry, which is robbing its own proletariat, but also the macro-proletariat of Andhra Pradesh and India.

Since the Total Socialism which we aim at, will not have a monetary economy and a market economy. what an actor gets in a State-Produced film will only be his food + clothing + shelter + old age security on par with any other worker in a Socialist Set up. In Proletarian Democracy (This has been mis-termed as Dictatorship of Proletariat by Karl Marx, and misinterpreted by dictators like Stalin and Mao Tse Tung, Castro and Kim to mean Totalitarian One party rule and Dictatorship.), Workers will decide (they can decide with a secret ballot), on the role to be played by artists such as actors, dancers, singers, and entertainers-pastimers like sports persons.

My name is OZYMANDIAS, King of Kings.. मेरा नाम ऒजिमांडियस्, राजाओं के राजा हूँ। నా పేరు ఒజిమాండియస్ !! రాజులకు రాజును నేను !!

TODAY'S ENGLISH POEM

Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)

//Ozymandias//

  I MET a Traveler from an antique land,
  Who said, "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
  Stand in the desart. Near them, on the sand,
  Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
  And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
  Tell that its sculptor well those passions read,
  Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
  The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
  And on the pedestal these words appear:
  "My name is OZYMANDIAS, King of Kings."
  Look on my works ye Mighty, and despair!
  No thing beside remains. Round the decay
  Of that Colossal Wreck, boundless and bare,
  The lone and level sands stretch far away.

IN TELUGU LANGUAGE, MY MOTHER TONGUE

నేనొక పురాతన గడ్డ పై చూశానొక యాత్రికుడిని. ఆ యాత్రికుడన్నాడు:

"ఎడారిలో రెండు మొండాలు లేని అతి పెద్ద కాళ్ళు నిలబడి ఉన్నాయి. దాని దగ్గరే ఇసకలో ఒక చితికిపోయిన ముఖం సగం కూరుకుపోయి పడి ఉన్నది. కనుబొమలు ముడుచుకు పోయి ఉన్నాయి. నుదురు ముడతలు పడింది. అతగాడి హృదయంలేని సుగ్రీవాజ్ఞ ముఖం పై ఇకిలింత, చక్రవర్తి మనోభావాలను శిల్పి బాగానే చదివాడని , అర్ధం చేసుకున్నాడని, చెప్తున్నాయి. ఆముఖ కళవళికలను ఎగతాళి చేస్తున్నట్లు, ఆశిల్పి హృదయం ఆ కాళ్ళున్న పీఠం పై చెక్కిన మాటలు ఇవి:-- < br / > 'నా పేరు ఒజిమాండియస్, రాజులకి రాజుని. ఓ శక్తిమాన్, నా పనిని చూడు, మరియు నిరుత్సాహపడు.'

ఇపుడా భారీ శిథిలాలకుప్ప చుట్టూ ఏమీ మిగల లేదు. ఇపుడు దాని చుట్టూ అనంతమైన, నిరామయమైన, ఒంటరిగా విస్తరించుకున్న బహుదూరపు ఇసుకపర్రలు తప్ప ఇంకేమీలేవు."

To continue. सशेष्. ఇంకా ఉంది.

591 Part 1/10 of "Film Industry persons learn nothing" फिल्म उद्योग इतिहास से कुछ नहीं सीखते చిత్ర పరిశ్రమ జనాలు చరిత్రనుండి ఏమీ నేర్చుకోరు.

Even after 74 years, International Film Industry, Indian Film Industry, Telugu film industry have not learnt any lessons. Here is an excerpt from an article penned by one Shri "rA rA ju" in Andhra Patrika 1941 Telugu Magazine, "Vrisha" Telugu New Year Day issue. The title of the article is "Telugu Film PariSrama dArulaku konni sUcanalu" (Some suggestions to the Telugu film industrialists). It is a detailed and lengthy review of the Telugu film industry of 1941 (సినిమా సింహావలోకనం). Though the writer intended them for the Film INdustry of the Telugu language, they apply to all the film industries of all languages and all countries in the world. This is because Capitalists learns never learn from History. They have a disdain towards History, and over-confidence in themselves, which often extends to a level of arrogance.

Is 1941 repeating in 2017?

తారల వేతనాలు తగ్గించాలి. (Salaries of Stars should be curtailed.)

స్టార్ సిస్టం వల్ల మనకిప్పుడంతగా ఒనగూడే లాభం లేదని పైన చెప్పే ఉన్నాను. I have already said that there will be no benefit to us with the Star System now.

తెలుగు ఫిలిమ్ పరిశ్రమలో కొందరు తారలకు హిందీ తారల కివ్వని వేతనాలు కూడ యిస్తున్నదని భ్రమ పడి ప్రొడ్యూసరులు ప్రఖ్యాత తారల కెగబడి, ఒకరిపై ఒకరు పోటీ పడి చేయటం వల్ల ఈ పరిస్థితి ఏర్పడింది. This situation has arisen because some producers, suffering from an illusion that Telugu film industry is paying high wages to Telugu Stars which Hindi film industry does not pay to Hindi stars, are standing in a crazy queque before the mega stars.

హిందీ చిత్ర పరిశ్రమతోనూ, వారికుండే మార్కెట్టుతో నూ, వారి చిత్రాల కొచ్చే ఆదాయం తోనూ పోల్చి చూస్తే తెలుగు తారలకు ఇప్పుడిచ్చే వేతనాల్లో నాలుగోవంతు కూడా యివ్వటం న్యాయం కాదు. It will not be reasonable to pay even 1/4th of the wages which we are now paying to Telugu Stars, when compared to the Hindi Film Industry, their markets, the income they get for their films.

కాబట్టి , నటీనటుల వేతనాల్లో , ఒక కనిష్ఠ ప్రమాణము, ఒక గరిష్ఠ ప్రమాణము నిర్ణయించుకొని ప్రొడ్యూసర్లందరూ ఆ పధ్ధతిని అనుసరించటం మంచిది. Hence it will be good for producers to arrive at a consensual minimum standard, maximum standard for payment of wages to stars, and follow those standards.

నెలకు రూ. 500 కంటే ఏతారకూ ఎక్కువ వేతనం ఇవ్వ పని అవసరం లేదని నా వుద్దేశం. It is my opinion that no star needs to be paid more than Rs. 500 per month.

కాంగ్రెస్ మంత్రులకు సైతం అంతకంటె ఎక్కువ జీతాలు లేవు. Even Congress Ministers, are not getting more than those wages.

ఏవిధంగా నైనా మన తెలుగ ఫిలిం పరిశ్రమ స్థిర పడి , ఎక్కువ ఆదాయం వస్తున్న తరువాత, ఈ వేతనాలు కావలిస్తే వృధ్ధి చేసుకోవచ్చు. In some manner or other, Telugu film industry has to stabilise first, raise its income. After that, we can raise the wages.

అంత వరకూ నటులైనా ఆవుపాలకు ఆశించవలెనే కానీ పొదుగుకోసి పాలు త్రాగటానికి ఆశ పడరాదు. Till then, even stars should only hope for cow's milk, and should not be tempted to cut their udders.

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

Monthly Rs. 500/- ! That it is more than the Congress Ministers of 1941. Today none of our Congress, BJP, TDP, TRS etc. Ministers will be satisfied unless they get at least Rs. 100 million per annum and Rs. 500 million in their five years term. Our mega stars, will they work for Rs. 1,00,000/- per month?

నెలకు రూ. ఐదు వందలా /-. మేము మెగా స్టార్లమా, బిచ్చ గాళ్ళమా. 1941 నాటి కాంగ్రెస్ మంత్రులకు ఆ దిక్కుమాలిన 1941 నెలకు రూ. 500 కన్నా తక్కువ ఇస్తే ఇచ్చి ఉండ వచ్చు. ఆనాటి నటులు నెలకు రూ. 500 కన్నా ఎక్కువ తీసుకుని రోల్స రాయస్ కార్లలో తిరిగి ఉండవచ్చు. ఇపుడు మేము రోల్స్ రాయిస్ కార్లలో తిరగాలంటే మాకు ఎంత కావాలి ? స్వాముల వార్లు కూడ లక్ష రూపాయలు ఇవ్వనిదే కాళ్ళు కడగనివ్వరు కదా. ఇంటికి వ చ్చి భిక్ష స్వీకరించరు కదా.

భారత్ వైశాల్యం ఎంత ? షుమారు ౩౩ లక్షల చదరపు కిలోమీటర్లు. ఈ ౩౩ లక్షల కిలోమీటర్లలో గంతులు వేస్తూ అర్ధం పర్ధం లేని పాటలకు స్టెప్పులు వేయటానికి కొండలకు, నదులకు, జలపాతాలకు, నగరాలకు, గ్రామాలకు, గుళ్ళకు, గోపురాలకు, వంద గజాల స్థలమే దొరకలేదా. స్విట్జర్లాండు, లండన్, సింగపూర్, ఫ్రాన్సు వెళ్ళి షూటింగ్ చేసుకోటానికి. ఇంత పేదదేశమైన మనకు యూరప్ , అమెరికా , జపాల్ లకు వెళ్ళి అక్కడ రోడ్లమీద గంతులు వెయటానికి సిగ్గూ శరమూ లేకపోతే ఎలా. ఇలా గంతులేసే ఖర్చులెవరివ్వాలి. కూలీ నాలీ చేసే తెలుంగు వీరులే కదా.

To continue. सशेष्. సశేషం.

Continuation blog-posts from here:

Go to 744