711 Is CPIM a bourgeoisie Party? Bengal CPM Secretary seems to be in a hurry to become CM !

The dividing line between Left Parties and the bourgeoisie parties has already disappeared. There is a proverb in Telugu: "Aru nelalu sahavAsam cEstE vALLu vILLavutAru, vILLu vALLavutAru.". English gist: If 'A' and 'B' make friendship for six months, 'A' will become 'B' and, 'B' will become 'A'. There will be a sort of "double de-composition" we see in Chemistry formulae. Craze can make Left Leaders speak and act in a more 'bourgeoisie' manner, than the traditional bourgeoisie parties.

Shri Surjya Kanta Mishra, CPM Secretary, Bengal, we can probably classify in that category of A becoming B, and B becoming A. He is reported to have said:

"...The first thing we will do is withdraw the case against the Tatas in Singur. We will create an industry-friendly climate..." "...(అధికారంలోకి వస్తే) మేము చేసే మొదటి పని ఏమిటంటే, సింగూరులో టాటాలకు వ్యతిరేకంగా, పెట్టబడిన కేసును ఉపసంహరించుకుంటాం. మేము పారిశ్రామికుల మిత్ర వాతావరణాన్ని సృష్టిస్తాము.

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

One doubt which may come to us most of us, in the context of Bengal elections: Did CPM get any donations from Tatas? In India Today, parties can run only if they spend in elections, by collecting funds from industrialists and business persons.

In 2011, CPM lost power by befriending with Tatas, and alienating farmers. TMC seized the opportunity, befriended farmers and opposed Tatas, and captured power.

Industrialists and Business Persons want land. They do not mind even if it is snatched away from small and marginal farmers. Bengal is a land-scarce State. Be it TMC or CPM, where will they get land for pampering industrialists, without snatching it from small farmers?

India is a land-scarce country vis-a-vis its population. Bengal is a land-scarce state vis-a-vis its population.

Question: During the nearly 37 years of CPM rule when Mr. Jyothi Basu and Mr. Buddhdeb Bhattacharya were Chief Ministers, Bengal stagnated. It lost its prime place in the commercial and industrial map of India. Today, it is rotting. Do you want to bring back the rotting culture?

Ans: Industrialists accumulate land for speculative purposes, by inflating their land needs. For example, if they need 100 acres to establish a factory, they will make an application fora 1000 acres, and the Governments may either allocate them 2000 acres or 500 acres depending on the kickbacks exchanged.

Experience has proved time and again that business persons and industrialists are more intelligent than bureaucrats and politicians of 1947-2016 India. If they consider that a business established at place X fetches great profits on the basis of their own methods of calculations, they will not hesitate to buy land at market value and establish their units. Tax concessions for some years and cheap land and power alone do not prompt calculative industrialists to locate their industries.

This is a subject, which needs a thousand posts/pages to write about. For example, why did Mr. Ratan Tata choose "Corus" in U.K. to purchase at an exhorbitant price, rather than starting a new Steel Unit in Jharkhand itself at a reasonable distance from Jamshedpur? If Late Jamshedji TATA could take a decision in the early 20th Century itself which was a Great Success of the Century, when there were no computer forecasting Quantitative Methods, how in 21st Century, could his clan-person take a hasty risky decision to make steel in U.K. ?

To continue. सशेष. ఇంకా ఉంది.

690 Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar seems to be making serious errors. If Mr. Sitaram Yechury sends him to Bengal, he will become a Narendra Modi for CPM !

Mr. Kanhaiyakumar, the student leader of JNU, who was arrested recently on "Sedition Charges" and released on bail, seems to be slipping again. He seems to be violating his bail conditions. If he is arrested again, he may not get his bail. Here is a quote attributed to him, of his having said on 8th March 2016, on the occasion of the Womens' Day.

"...No matter how much you try to stop us, we will speak up against human rights violations. We will raise our voice against AFSPA. While we have a lot of respect for our soldiers, we will still talk about the fact that in Kashmir women are raped by security personnel..."

ybrao-a-donkey's humble comments. वैबीराव एक गधे के विनम्र राय . వైబీరావ్ గాడిద వినమ్ర వాణి. You have every right to differ with me. I respect your right. आपको मेरे मत से भिन्न राय रखने के संपूर्ण हक है। मै उस अधिकार को परिपूर्ण रूप से गौरव देता हुँ. మీకు, మీ భిన్నమైన అభిప్రాయాన్ని కలిగిఉండే సంపూర్ణ హక్కు ఉంది. దానిని ఎంతో నేను గౌరవిస్తాను. However, pl. examine this donkey's views also. परन्तु एस गधे के दृष्टिकोण को भी अनुशीलन कीजिये. కానీ ఈ గాడిద దృష్టికోణాన్ని కూడ ఓర చూపుతో కంటజూడుమీ, క్రీగంట జూడమీ.

Generalisations can be extremely dangerous, both to himself and to the security of the country. Stray cases of rapes in Kashmir, might have take place, at an "individual soldier" level. If any such instances have come to the notice of Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, the right Courses of Action for him would have been

1. motivate the suffering woman to file a Criminal Complaint at a Police Station, and if necessary also with the appropriate Army Authorities (superiors of the soldier)

2. If no action is taken by police in spite of Police Complaint , or complaint to the Army Authorities, Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar can help the victim to approach National Human Rights Commission, National Women's Commission.

3. He can also help her to file a private case, with the help of some service-oriented Lawyers, in a Magistrate Court.

Even after all the steps enumerated above, if nobody bothers about the particular victim, Mr. Kumar and his associates can take the help of MPs of any party including his own Party, or the CPI, for using their good Offices to follow up the case.

After trying everything, if he still finds there is no solution, he can approach through PILs in High Courts under Article 226, or Supreme Court under Article 32.

Specific Cases of Rape whether in Kashmir, Gujarat, or in any other part of India, Media will not normally overlook, if it goes to their Notice. Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar or his affiliated Political Party can take up the issue with Media, and arrange for vide Publicity. Then the Army Authorities, Police Authorities, Administrators will definitely take some action.

Rape is a personal crime, committed by the soldier in his personal capacity. For such crimes, Indian Penal Code, normal Civilian Acts such as Nirbhaya Act will invariably apply. AFPSPA will not apply. Protection of AFPSPA will be available only when soldiers do something in their Official Capacity, under orders from their superiors.

By generalising things, by making wild allegations, Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar will be handing over a stick to Pakisthan, to beat India with.

Wild allegations, demoralise the Indian Army Jawans, wherever they are fighting. Just as Civilians are not rapists, Soldiers cannot be rapists. Because of immaturity, may be owing to age, Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar may be crossing limits in making allegations against Indian Army. By making generalisations, and wild allegations, Mr. Kumar will be giving a stick to ABVP and BJP, to beat him with.

If we say that JNU Students are rapists or debauchers, simply because some condoms are found in the premises of JNU, we shall be doing grave injustice to JNU. Same is the case with Indian Army.

TAIL PIECE धुम केतु తోక చుక్క

According to reports, it seems that Mr. Seetharam Yechury wanted to use Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar for electioneering in West Bengal, against Ms. Mamata Banerjee.

That will be dangerous. It can be as suicidal as Mr. L.K. Advani's, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee's, Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi's encouraging Mr. Narendra Modi, by sending him to Gujarat as CM. By doing that, they might have learnt their lessons.

Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar seems to have some similarities with Mr. Narendra Modi, and Mr. Arvind Kejriwal. He is capable of overturning Mr. Seetharam Yechury, Mr. Prakash Karat, and everybody in CPM hierarchy.

When he says that he does not want to enter Politics, I get an impression that he is trying to preserve the cake and also eat it too, at the same time. He seems to be hoping for a Professor's Job, and then throw stones against Indian Army during his spare time, while drawing his salary from Indian Exchequer. As a person hailing from a poor family, the One lakh bucks he may get by becoming a Professor, may be very valuable for him. (It is how Prof. Kodanda Ram of Osmania University worked for Telangana State. While drawing his salary from his University, without teaching anything, he seems to have worked in the Telangana JAC. In my personal view, it is a sort of cheating. My readers need not agree with me).

Working like a true duty-bound Professor, can also be a service to the Nation, and to the Leftism, even without imposing Leftist views on the Students. In fact, parents or teachers or Professors can never really influence their wards by teaching, preaching, advising, lecturing, etc. etc. By their behavior, they demonstrate to their children / students. If the children / students, find that their father /teacher / lecturer / Professor was worthy of emulation, they will voluntarily emulate. Else, they will learn from the Environment. No need to worry. A Motivator's job will be just to furnish information, and make it available to the "targeted persons / groups".

Subject to substantial Revision, additions and deletions. To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.