702 (Part 6 of Kanhaiya-JNU affair)- Will Mr. Sitaram Yechury send Lal Salams to Afzal Guru and Yakoub Momen also? Will he send his Lal Salams to Asaduddin Ovaisi also?

Mr. Sitaram Yechury, the Boss of Communist Party of India (Marxist), popular in India as CPIM or CPM has tweeted his Lal Salams to Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, the JNU Students Leader on March 3, 2016. But Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar appears to be getting deeply entrenched and entangled in his support to Afzal Guru and Yakoub Momen's followers. Will Mr. Sitaram Yechury continue his Lal Salams to Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, if Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar continues his association with the followers of Afzal Guru and Yakoub Momen?

The High Power Committee appointed by JNU's Vice Chancellor, submitted its report on the happenings in JNU on Feb. 9. Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar and other students sought time for replying JNU's Notice, to consult Legal opinion. The JNU gave them time upto 5 pm on 18.3.2016. After perusing the Replies of the Students, and taking into consideration the Recommendations of the High Power Committee, the VC may take his decision, of course after consulting Home Ministry and HRD Ministry.

The justification of VC's decision, will again become an object of Judicial Review, because the affected students will approach High Courts u/article 226 of Constitution, and Supreme Court u/article 32 of Constitution. If High Court's decision goes against the JNU, or the Students, either party will again appeal to Supreme Court for Revision / SLP. etc. etc.

While the AAP Government has sent the relevant videos to a Private Lab. in Hyderabad, and that Private Lab confirmed that 2 of the 5 videos are doctored, Mr. Sitaram Yechury was happy with the Private Lab's Report, rather than asking for analyses of the reports in a Government Laboratory.

Whether the 2/5 of Videos are doctored and 3/5 of the Videos are not doctored, the High Power Committee has made two findings: Anti India slogans were given by some persons wearing scarfs/masks. There are Eye-witnesses.

We have gauged this issue of "Sloganeering by outsiders" in Part 1 and Part 2 (see blog Posts 676, 686, 690, 693, 699). Now, the High Power Panel of JNU confirmed it. They found some Security Lapses, in allowing outsiders into the Meeting.

In India, the key problem is OUTSIDERS ARE HYJACKING MEETINGS AND RALLIES. When lawyers thrashed Kanhaiya Kumar in Patiala Courts, some outsiders in Lawyers' Coats seem to have infiltrated into the crowd, in spite of nearly 1000 Police Personnel guarding there.

The same is the case in the burning of Ratnachal Express in Tuni Railway Station, during Kapu Reservation Agitation led by Mr. Mudragada Padmanabham in Andhra Pradesh.

The same is the case, in large scale destruction of Public Property during Jat Reservation Agitation.

What is the lesson from all this? Meetings are to be held in Closed Halls, collecting xerox copies of identity cards, Adhar Cards, entering all the details in separate Registers. Still, better method will be to have BioMetric Attendance hand-machines for checking finger prints, iris, etc. If the Organisers fail to do it, Police should do it independently.



Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar appears to be confusing himself by mixing up the problems of socio-economic backwardness of dalits, and their sufferings - with Afzal Guru, Yakoub Momen, something else, something else. In the process, he is entangling himself irretrivably.

WHO SHOULD DECIDE WHAT IS NATIONAL, AND WHAT IS NOT NATIONAL

Now, the plate of Indian Citizens is full. The Maharashtra Assembly expelled an AIMIM M.L.A. from the Assembly, because he refused to say "Bharat MAtA ki Jai". Of course, that MLA, and their leader Asaduddin Ovaisi, said they will say "Jai Hind", and they confirmed their adherence to India's Constitution.

Then, there are some rewards for "tongue-cutters", who will cut the tongues of the blasphemers. How seriously, Maharashtra Police will pursue the cases against those who announced rewards for the tongue-cutters? How seriously, Maharashtra Police will follow up cases against Mr. Asaduddin Ovaisi, for his speeches which are likely to intensify communal divide? These two are going to be serious questions.

Mr. Sitaram Yechury, CPIM boss, without thinking deeply about Afzal Guru and Yakoub Momen, tweeted Lal Salam to Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar. By doing this, Mr. Sitaram Yechury and CPIM are indirectly supporting Afzal Guru and Yakoub Momen. Needless say , that Senior Leaders are to be very careful in their actions, because their followers blindly imitate them. (This applies to Mr. Rahul Gandhi, Mr. Narendra Modi, and Ms. Sonia Gandhi also).

Lal Salam Comrade Kanhaiya. आज़ाद हिंदुस्तान का भविष्य आप की पीढ़ी के ही हाथों में है.. #JNULongLive 499 retweets 521 likes Sitaram Yechury ‏@SitaramYechury Mar 3

We have to see whether Mr. Sitaram Yechury will tweet his Lal Salams to Asaduddin Ovaisi also.

Simultaneously, the Union Government should appoint a Independent Special Judicial Commission with Constitutional Experts, to decide and adjudicate whether Bharat Mata ki Jai, Vande Mataram, should become legally Enforceable National Slogans, like National Anthem. It is high time, GOI and Supreme Court bring clarity on this serious issue which is going to threaten the National Integrity of India. That Special Commission + GOI + Supreme Court have to decide on the role to be played by Extra-Constitutional Power Groups and NGOs.

Small disputes at local level, can culminate in Civil Wars at National Level. Our Leaders have to foresee a lot, and meet the future half-way ahead before Crises strike us fatally. In Management Terminology, this is called STRATEGY PLANNING. Mr. Narendra Modi, Mr. Rajnath Singh, Ms. Smriti Irani, pl. wake up from your dreams.

Subject to substantial Revision, additions and deletions. To continue and revise this, with more proof.. सशेष. సశేషం.